journal article·2021-08-18

Solving the corrosion behaviour and cobalt content correlation anomaly in electrodeposited Ni–Co coatings by analysis of coating micro-texture, strain and grain boundary constitution

K. Sai Jyotheender, Sweety Arora, Chandan Srivastava

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 101· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Ni–Co alloy coatings exhibit excellent tribological properties. However, these coatings are vulnerable to corrosion due to the lower corrosion potential of Co when compared to Ni. The decrease in the corrosion resistance of Ni–Co alloy with increasing Co content is not monotonous. At an optimum Co content, very high corrosion resistance behaviour is observed. This anomaly is investigated here. Ni–Co coatings (Ni, Ni–9 wt% Co and Ni–20 wt% Co) were electrodeposited over mild steel. Potentiodynamic polarisation illustrated Ni coatings highest corrosion resistance, whereas, between the Ni–Co coatings, Ni–20 wt% Co coating exhibited higher corrosion resistance in 3.5 wt% NaCl medium. Higher corrosion resistance in Ni–20 wt% Co coating was primarily due to uniform distribution of low energy grain boundaries like Σ3 coincidence site lattices (CSLs) in the coating. Higher corrosion rate for Ni–9 wt% Co coatings was due to strained grains and non-uniform distribution of low energy grain boundaries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Funding

CSIR · [Council of Scientific and Industrial Research India] Government of India

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.00110.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.05.01610.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.05.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.08.02210.1016/j.apsusc.2006.08.022 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.29010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.290 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.17410.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.174 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00419-X10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00419-X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.12310.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.123 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10854-020-02981-z10.1007/s10854-020-02981-z ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.02810.1016/j.msec.2014.01.028 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.10.01410.1016/j.mee.2009.10.014 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10854-013-1224-010.1007/s10854-013-1224-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.06.01710.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.06.017 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11998-012-9437-310.1007/s11998-012-9437-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10061710.1016/j.mtla.2020.100617 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-020-06070-y10.1007/s11661-020-06070-y ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10039810.1016/j.mtla.2019.100398 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.01.00510.1016/j.ultramic.2012.01.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107145 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-012-6739-x10.1007/s10853-012-6739-x ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.06210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.062 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.06810.1016/j.msea.2012.03.068 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.06210.1016/j.msea.2017.10.062 ↗
23. 10.5006/0010-9312-19.3.10210.5006/0010-9312-19.3.102 ↗
24. 10.1039/C9RA04294F10.1039/C9RA04294F ↗
25. 10.1016/0956-7151(95)90169-810.1016/0956-7151(95)90169-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-410.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗