Morphology of single Shockley-type stacking faults generated by recombination enhanced dislocation glide in 4H–SiC
Source abstract
Abstract
Morphology of single Shockley-type stacking faults (SFs) generated by recombination enhanced dislocation glide (REDG) in 4H–SiC are discussed and analysed. A complete set of the 12 different dissociated states of basal-plane dislocation loops is obtained using the crystallographic space group operations. From this set, six different double rhombic-shaped SFs are derived. These tables indicate the rules that connect shapes of SFs with the locations of partial dislocations having different core structures, the positions of slip planes in a unit cell, and the Burgers vectors of partial dislocations. We applied these tables for the analysis of SFs generated by the REDG effect reported in the past articles. Shapes, growing process of SFs and perfect dislocations for origins of SFs were well analysed systematically.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Engineering Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo Japan
International Center for Materials Nano-Architectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0927-796X(97)00005-310.1016/S0927-796X(97)00005-3 ↗
2. 10.7567/JJAP.54.04010310.7567/JJAP.54.040103 ↗
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.353-35610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.353-356 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.146889110.1063/1.1468891 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.199929710.1063/1.1999297 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.02550210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.025502 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.175621810.1063/1.1756218 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.215957810.1063/1.2159578 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.163396910.1063/1.1633969 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.148790410.1063/1.1487904 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.150599410.1063/1.1505994 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.162068410.1063/1.1620684 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.06510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.065 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.494316510.1063/1.4943165 ↗
15. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.679-68010.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.679-680 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.496271710.1063/1.4962717 ↗
17. 10.1080/14786435.2014.89464610.1080/14786435.2014.894646 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.10.00610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.10.006 ↗
19. Hirth J.P. · 1969
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.264710.1103/PhysRevB.57.2647 ↗
21. 10.1107/S010876730001291510.1107/S0108767300012915 ↗
22. Hahn Th. · 1987
23. 10.1063/1.280934310.1063/1.2809343 ↗
24. Zhang N. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 94 · 122108
25. 10.1063/1.323657910.1063/1.3236579 ↗
26. 10.1080/14786435.2017.135078810.1080/14786435.2017.1350788 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.296033910.1063/1.2960339 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11664-010-1168-610.1007/s11664-010-1168-6 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.23320310.1103/PhysRevB.81.233203 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.344290710.1063/1.3442907 ↗
31. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.600-60310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.600-603 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.370096310.1063/1.3700963 ↗
33. 10.1142/992210.1142/9922 ↗
34. 10.7567/APEX.10.08120110.7567/APEX.10.081201 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.223474010.1063/1.2234740 ↗
36. 10.1080/0141861880821440810.1080/01418618808214408 ↗