journal article·2007-09-11Open access

Extension of the Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt elastic grain-interaction models to general loading states

U. Welzel, S. Fréour†

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 87· Issue 26

Abstract

The recently developed Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt elastic grain-interaction models have been employed for the calculation of mechanical elastic constants and diffraction (X-ray) stress factors of, in particular, thin films. However, their applicability is limited to a planar, rotationally symmetric state of macroscopic, mechanical stress. For such a loading state (and an, at least, transversely, elastically isotropic specimen), only two mechanical elastic constants are necessary to describe mechanical elastic behaviour and only the sum of two diffraction (X-ray) stress factors is needed to relate lattice strains to the one independent component of the mechanical stress tensor. The restriction to a planar, rotationally symmetric state of mechanical stress will be removed in this work. Calculation of the full stiffness tensor and all six diffraction (X-ray) stress factors then becomes possible. It was found previously that the Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt models become (but only approximately) equivalent to the Eshelby–Kröner model for certain ideal grain-shape textures. For this reason, results of numerical calculations of mechanical elastic constants and diffraction (X-ray) stress factors, based on the Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt models, will be presented and compared to corresponding results obtained from the Eshelby--Kröner grain-interaction model considering ideal grain-shape (‘morphological’) textures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Chinh PD · Phil. Mag. · 2006 · 86 · 20510.1080/14786430500343876 ↗
2. Kröner E · J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. · 1978 · 8 · 226110.1088/0305-4608/8/11/011 ↗
3. Hauk V · 1997
4. Welzel U · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 900110.1063/1.1569662 ↗
5. Welzel U · Phil. Mag. · 2005 · 85 · 239110.1080/14786430500070685 ↗
6. Welzel U · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2005 · 38 · 110.1107/S0021889804029516 ↗
7. Voigt W · 1910
8. Reuss A · Z. Angew. Math. Mech. · 1929 · 9 · 4910.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
9. Neerfeld H · Mitt. K.-Wilh.-Inst. Eisenforschg. · 1942 · 24 · 61
10. Hill R · Proc. Phys. Soc. London A · 1952 · 65 · 34910.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
11. Kröner E · Z. Phys. · 1958 · 151 · 50410.1007/BF01337948 ↗
12. van Leeuwen M · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 86 · 190410.1063/1.370986 ↗
13. Leoni M · Phil. Mag. A · 2001 · 81 · 59710.1080/01418610108212161 ↗
14. Welzel U · Phil. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 60310.1080/0141861021000042299 ↗
15. Welzel, U, Leoni, M and Mittemeijer, EJ. 2004.Diffraction Analysis of the Microstructure of Materials, Edited by: Mittemeijer, EJ and Scardi, P. 363–390. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-06723-9_14 ↗
16. Vook RW · J. Appl. Phys. · 1965 · 36 · 216910.1063/1.1714442 ↗
17. Koch N · Phil. Mag. · 2004 · 84 · 354710.1080/14786430412331284504 ↗
18. Giacovazzo C · 1998
19. Sprauel JM · Mater. Sci. Forum · 1991 · 79 · 14310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.79-82.143 ↗
20. Roe R-J · J. Chem. Phys. · 1964 · 40 · 260810.1063/1.1725571 ↗
21. Meyers, MA and Chawla, KK. 1984.Mechanical Metallurgy, Principles and Applications, 57Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.