journal article·2022-05-19

Faceting of twin interfaces in rolled pure magnesium

Ritu Verma, Lubomír Král, Andriy Ostapovets

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 102· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Recent studies proved that the faceting of twin boundaries is a common feature in hcp materials. It was demonstrated that the asymmetrical facets in the most frequent {101¯2} and {101¯1} twin interfaces are the consequence of the twin boundary migration mechanism. We demonstrate that a similar mechanism is also applicable to less common {112¯6} twins, observed in pure magnesium rolled at room temperature. The migration of {112¯6} twin boundary is mediated by disconnections, which have Burgers vector b=0.030[112¯1¯] and step height equal to four {112¯6} interplanar distances. The mechanism of asymmetrical facets nucleation is also demonstrated by using atomistic simulations. The simulations are supported by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of asymmetrical basal-pyramidal interfaces of {112¯6} twins.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic

Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics of Materials, Brno, Czech Republic

Funding

Czech Science Foundation · Central European Institute of Technology

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Jiang S. · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 1
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.00410.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10331410.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103314 ↗
4. 10.3390/met1011140310.3390/met10111403 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11670710.1016/j.actamat.2021.116707 ↗
6. 10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.03410.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.034 ↗
8. 10.1098/rspa.2011.073110.1098/rspa.2011.0731 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.04310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.043 ↗
10. 10.1080/09500839.2011.59357610.1080/09500839.2011.593576 ↗
11. Cayron C. · Acta Cryst. · 2018 · 74 · 44
12. 10.1080/14786435.2017.129084610.1080/14786435.2017.1290846 ↗
13. 10.1088/0965-0393/22/2/02501510.1088/0965-0393/22/2/025015 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.023 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-014-2481-010.1007/s11661-014-2481-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.02110.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.021 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.01810.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.03.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.03.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X10.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.06.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.06.029 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.00510.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.03910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.039 ↗
23. 10.3390/met1009113410.3390/met10091134 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.02411610.1103/PhysRevB.73.024116 ↗
25. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
26. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.028 ↗
28. 10.1080/14786435.2018.152416010.1080/14786435.2018.1524160 ↗
29. 10.1016/0036-9748(87)90434-010.1016/0036-9748(87)90434-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90054-510.1016/0001-6160(88)90054-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.002 ↗
32. 10.1080/0141861960824438610.1080/01418619608244386 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.01710.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.017 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11662210.1016/j.actamat.2021.116622 ↗