Faceting of twin interfaces in rolled pure magnesium
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies proved that the faceting of twin boundaries is a common feature in hcp materials. It was demonstrated that the asymmetrical facets in the most frequent {101¯2} and {101¯1} twin interfaces are the consequence of the twin boundary migration mechanism. We demonstrate that a similar mechanism is also applicable to less common {112¯6} twins, observed in pure magnesium rolled at room temperature. The migration of {112¯6} twin boundary is mediated by disconnections, which have Burgers vector b=0.030[112¯1¯] and step height equal to four {112¯6} interplanar distances. The mechanism of asymmetrical facets nucleation is also demonstrated by using atomistic simulations. The simulations are supported by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of asymmetrical basal-pyramidal interfaces of {112¯6} twins.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics of Materials, Brno, Czech Republic
Funding
Czech Science Foundation · Central European Institute of Technology
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang S. · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 1
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.00410.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10331410.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103314 ↗
4. 10.3390/met1011140310.3390/met10111403 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11670710.1016/j.actamat.2021.116707 ↗
6. 10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.03410.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.034 ↗
8. 10.1098/rspa.2011.073110.1098/rspa.2011.0731 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.04310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.043 ↗
10. 10.1080/09500839.2011.59357610.1080/09500839.2011.593576 ↗
11. Cayron C. · Acta Cryst. · 2018 · 74 · 44
12. 10.1080/14786435.2017.129084610.1080/14786435.2017.1290846 ↗
13. 10.1088/0965-0393/22/2/02501510.1088/0965-0393/22/2/025015 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.023 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-014-2481-010.1007/s11661-014-2481-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.02110.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.021 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.01810.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.03.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.03.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X10.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.06.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.06.029 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.00510.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.03910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.039 ↗
23. 10.3390/met1009113410.3390/met10091134 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.02411610.1103/PhysRevB.73.024116 ↗
25. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
26. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.028 ↗
28. 10.1080/14786435.2018.152416010.1080/14786435.2018.1524160 ↗
29. 10.1016/0036-9748(87)90434-010.1016/0036-9748(87)90434-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90054-510.1016/0001-6160(88)90054-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.002 ↗
32. 10.1080/0141861960824438610.1080/01418619608244386 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.01710.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.017 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11662210.1016/j.actamat.2021.116622 ↗