journal article·2007-04

Effect of Y concentration on the microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Mg–Zn–Y–Zr alloys

D.K. Xu, W.N. Tang, L. Liu, Y.B. Xu, E.H. Han

Journal of Alloys and Compounds· Volume 432· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, the influence of element Y on the mechanical properties of the as-cast Mg-5.5Zn-xY-0.8Zr alloys (with element Y content of 0, 1.08, 1.97 and 3.08 wt.%) has been investigated and compared. The results showed that the alloy with Y content of 1.08 wt.% had the superior tensile strength, but its ductility was the lowest. When Y content reached 1.97 or 3.08 wt.%, the tensile strength of the alloys decreased obviously, but the ductility had a little improvement. X-ray phase analysis showed that when Y content was 1.08 wt.%, the alloy mainly contained I-phase and alpha-Mg matrix, whereas when Y content was 1.97 or 3.08 wt.%, besides I-phase and alpha-Mg matrix, W-phase would be formed. And the diffraction peak of W-phase intensified with the increase of element Y content. Based on fracture observations, the influence of I-phase and W-phase on the mechanical properties of the alloys has been explained, respectively. It revealed that I-phase was closely bonded with the Mg matrix and could effectively retard the basal slip, and then strengthened the alloy greatly. However, W-phase was easily cracked during the tensile process, which degraded the mechanical properties. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Hydrogen Storage and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Unsworth · Met. Mater. · 1998 · 4 · 83
2. Singh · Scripta Mater. · 2003 · 49 · 14310.1016/S1359-6462(03)00217-3 ↗
3. Padezhnova · Russ. Metall. · 1982 · 4 · 185
4. Luo · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1993 · 12 · 149010.1007/BF00277074 ↗
5. Janot · 1994
6. 1993 · 542
7. Ya Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2004 · A373 · 32010.1016/j.msea.2004.02.007 ↗
8. Xiaoqin Zeng · J. Alloys Compd. · 2005 · 395 · 21310.1016/j.jallcom.2004.10.070 ↗
9. Xu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2006 · 426 · 15510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.02.035 ↗
10. Park · 2001
11. Ju Yeon Lee · Mater. Lett. · 2005 · 59 · 380110.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.052 ↗
12. Luo · J. Alloys Compd. · 1995 · 230 · 10910.1016/0925-8388(95)01893-X ↗
13. Horstemeyer · Acta mater. · 2004 · 52 · 132710.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.018 ↗
14. Chunjiang Ma · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 349 · 20710.1016/S0921-5093(02)00740-2 ↗
15. Guangling Song · J. Light Met. · 2002 · 2 · 110.1016/S1471-5317(02)00008-1 ↗
16. Bae · Acta Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 234310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00067-8 ↗
17. Clark · 1996 · 2571
18. Nayeb-Hashemi · 1996 · 2566
19. Padezhnova · 1997 · 12369
20. Petch · J. Iron Steel Inst. · 1953 · 174 · 25
21. Hall · Proc. Phys. Soc. B · 1951 · 64 · 74710.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗