journal article·2012-08

Comparative analysis of CFD models for jetting fluidized beds: Effect of particle-phase viscosity

Pei Pei, Kai Zhang, Gang Xu, Yongping Yang, Dongsheng Wen

Particuology· Volume 10· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Under the Eulerian–Eulerian framework of simulating gas–solid two-phase flow, the accuracy of the hydrodynamic prediction is strongly affected by the selection of rheology of the particulate phase, for which a detailed assessment is still absent. Using a jetting fluidized bed as an example, this work investigates the influence of solid rheology on the hydrodynamic behavior by employing different particle-phase viscosity models. Both constant particle-phase viscosity model (CVM) with different viscosity values and a simple two-fluid model without particle-phase viscosity (NVM) are incorporated into the classical two-fluid model and compared with the experimental measurements. Qualitative and quantitative results show that the jet penetration depth, jet frequency and averaged bed pressure drop are not a strong function of the particle-phase viscosity. Compared to CVM, the NVM exhibits better predictions on the jet behaviors, which is more suitable for investigating the hydrodynamics of gas–solid fluidized bed with a central jet.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. The role of meso-scale structures in rapid gas solid flows10.1017/S0022112001005663 ↗
2. Hydrodynamic analysis of dilute gas–solids flow in a vertical pipe10.1016/0032-5910(90)80080-I ↗
3. Porosity distributions in a fluidized bed with an immersed obstacle10.1002/aic.690350604 ↗
4. A new model for the prediction of the behaviour of fluidized beds10.1016/j.powtec.2006.01.011 ↗
5. Particle packing constraints in fluid-particle system simulation10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00258-2 ↗
6. The effect of particle drag relationships on prediction of kinematic wave velocity in fluidized beds10.1016/0032-5910(91)80099-5 ↗
7. Dallavalle · 1948
8. The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems10.1016/0301-9322(94)90011-6 ↗
9. Solids behaviour in a gas–solid two-phase mixture flowing through a packed particle bed10.1016/j.ces.2005.04.052 ↗
10. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of spouted bed: Assessment of drag coefficient correlations10.1016/j.ces.2005.08.013 ↗
11. Eulerian two-phase flow theory applied to fluidization10.1016/S0301-9322(96)90004-X ↗
12. Fluid dynamics stability of fluidized suspensions: The particle bed model10.1016/0009-2509(87)85021-2 ↗
13. Gibilaro · 2001
14. Generalized friction factor and drag coefficient correlations for fluid-particle interactions10.1016/0009-2509(85)80116-0 ↗
15. Hydrodynamics of fluidization and heat transfer: Supercomputer modeling10.1115/1.3143702 ↗
16. Gidaspow · 1994
17. Fluidization in two-dimensional beds with a jet 2. Hydrodynamic modeling10.1021/i100010a008 ↗
18. Comparison of Eulerian hydrodynamic models with non-intrusive X-ray measurements in pressurized dense gas-fluidized bed
19. Ishii · 1975
20. The effect of pressure on jet penetration in semi-cylindrical gas-fluidized bed
21. Experimental and theoretical porosity profiles in two-dimensional gas-fluidized bed with a central jet10.1016/0032-5910(92)88008-6 ↗
22. Kwauk · 2008
23. Li · 2005
24. Modelling of the behaviour of gas–solid two-phase mixtures flowing through packed beds10.1016/j.ces.2005.10.047 ↗
25. The propagation of a voidage disturbance in a uniformly fluidized bed10.1017/S0022112083001391 ↗
26. Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas–solid fluidized beds – Part I: Bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds operated with a jet10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.059 ↗
27. Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas–solid fluidized beds – Part II: Freely bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds10.1016/j.ces.2004.07.058 ↗
28. CFD simulation of a gas–solid fluidized bed with two vertical jets10.1016/j.partic.2010.08.001 ↗
29. Pei, P., Zhang, K., & Wen, D. S. Comparative analysis of CFD models for jetting fluidized beds: The effect of inter-phase drag force. Powder Technology, in press.
30. Simulation of granular layer inversion in liquid fluidized beds10.1016/0301-9322(88)90023-7 ↗
31. Gas motion and bubble formation at the distributor of a fluidized bed10.1016/0032-5910(90)80008-M ↗
32. Numerical computation and experimental verification of the jet region in a fluidized bed10.1021/ie010962u ↗
33. Experimental and numerical study of fluid dynamic parameters in a jetting fluidized bed of a binary mixture10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00041-X ↗
34. Computational fluid dynamics for dense gas–solid fluidized beds10.1080/10020070512330006 ↗
35. CFD simulation of fluidization quality in the three-dimensional fluidized bed10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.02.002 ↗
36. CFD simulation of flow pattern and jet penetration depth in gas-fluidized beds with single and double jets10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.018 ↗