journal article·2025-12-25Open access

Characterizing the Regionality of Concrete Sustainability Using Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components

Michael Henry, Joel Opon

Abstract

While local in its usage, concrete carries global implications due to the sheer demand for concrete worldwide. Previous work has laid out the general principles and directions for improving the sustainability of concrete, but there is a need to understand and evaluate the relative importance of these issues at the regional and local levels to formulate effective and issue-specific solutions. This study applies hierarchical clustering on principal components, a machine learning technique, to characterize the regionality of concrete sustainability among the 47 prefectures of Japan using a set of eight regional variables that describe pressing sustainability issues for concrete construction. The analysis identified and quantitatively described five distinct clusters of prefectures using statistical metrics, then examined these patterns in the context of the socio-economic characteristics of the prefectures in each cluster. The need to effectively utilize concrete waste or increase utilization of blended cements were found to be critical issues in some prefectures, while other prefectures should aim to reduce cement consumption or water and energy consumption and CO2 emissions. The results may be used to inform more sustainable decision-making by revealing local sustainability issues that should be prioritized. Furthermore, although the regional patterns found in this study are unique to Japan, the analytical approach serves as a demonstration of how regional differences in concrete sustainability may be investigated, and it is expected that future studies will build on this study to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the regionality of concrete sustainability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Toyosu 3-7-5, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan.

Department of Civil Engineering and Technology, Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Philippines.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Aghabozorgi, S., Shirkhorshidi, A. S., & Wah, T. Y. (2015). Time-series clustering – A decade review. Information Systems, 53, 16-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.00710.1016/j.is.2015.04.007 ↗
2. 2) Ali, M. K., Nasir, A., Abbasi, K. J., & Sajid, M. (2024). A comparative multidimensional evaluation of parameters and alternatives for transformation of sustainable cement production in Pakistan. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 93, 101884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.10188410.1016/j.seps.2024.101884 ↗
3. 3) Aluja, T., Morineau, A., & Sanchez, G. (2018). Principal component analysis for data science. San Franciso: GitHub HQ. https://pca4ds.github.io/
4. 4) Badraddin, A. K., Rahman, R. A., Almutairi, S., & Esa, M. (2021). Main challenges to concrete recycling in practice. Sustainability, 13(19), 11077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13191107710.3390/su131911077 ↗
5. 5) Barcelo, L., Kline, J., Walenta, G., & Gartner, E. (2014). Cement and carbon emissions. Materials and Structures, 49, 1055-1065. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0114-510.1617/s11527-013-0114-5 ↗
6. 6) Bell, S., & Morse, M. (2008). Sustainability indicators – Measuring the immeasurable? London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
7. 7) Berlage, L., & Terweduwe, D. (1988). The classification of countries by cluster and by factor analysis. World Development, 16(12), 1527-1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(88)90225-210.1016/0305-750X(88)90225-2 ↗
8. 8) Busch, P., Kendall, A., Murphy, C. W., & Miller, S. A. (2022). Literature review on policies to mitigate GHG emissions for cement and concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, 106278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10627810.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106278 ↗
9. 9) D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Imbriani, C., & Morone, P. (2021). Assessing regional performance for the sustainable development goals in Italy. Scientific Reports, 11, 24117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03635-810.1038/s41598-021-03635-8 ↗
10. 10) Darand, M., & Daneshvar, M. R. M. (2014). Regionalization of precipitation regimes in Iran using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis. Environmental Processes, 1, 517-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0039-110.1007/s40710-014-0039-1 ↗
11. 11) Duley, G., Dujourdy, L., Klein, S., Wewein, A., Spartz, C., Gougeon, R. D., & Taylor, D. K. (2021). Regionality in Australian Pinot noir wines: A study on the use of NMR and ICP-MS on commercial wines. Food Chemistry, 340(15), 127906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12790610.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127906 ↗
12. 12) Favier, A., De Wolf, C., Scrivener, K., & Guillaume, H. (2018). A sustainable future for the European cement and concrete industry: Technology assessment for full decarbonisation of the industry by 2050. Zurich: ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000301843
13. 13) Fukushima, A., Kanamori, H., & Matsumoto, J. (2019). Regionality of long-term trends and interannual variation of seasonal precipitation over India. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 6, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0255-410.1186/s40645-019-0255-4 ↗
14. 14) Gagg, C. R. (2014). Cement and concrete as an engineering material: An historic appraisal and case study analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 40, 114-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.00410.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.004 ↗
15. 15) Georgopoulos, C., & Minson, A. (2014). Sustainable concrete solutions. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.10.56330/UXKZ1179 ↗
16. 16) Ghosh, A., & Hasan, A. (2020). Recent patterns and trends in sustainable concrete research in India: A five-year scientometric review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 32, 910-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.74410.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.744 ↗
17. 17) Henry, M., & Kato, Y. (2012). Perspectives on sustainable practice and materials in the Japanese concrete industry. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24(3), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000038810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000388 ↗
18. 18) Henry, M., & Kato, Y. (2014). Sustainable concrete in Asia: Approaches and barriers considering regional context. Construction and Building Materials, 67, 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.07410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.074 ↗
19. 19) Husson, F., Josse, J., & Pagès, J. (2010). Principal component methods hierarchical clustering partitional clustering: Why would we need to choose for visualizing data? [online]. Rennes, France, Agrocampus. Available from: < http://www.sthda.com/english/upload/hcpc_husson_josse.pdf >.
20. 20) International Cement Review. (2022). The global cement report. (14th ed.). Dorking, Surrey, UK: Tradeship Publications Ltd.
21. 21) Justnes, H. (2015). How to make concrete more sustainable. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 13(3), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.13.14710.3151/jact.13.147 ↗
22. 22) Kassambara, A. (2017a). Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: Unsupervised machine learning. Lyon, France: Statistical Tools for High-throughput Data Analysis Platform (STHDA).
23. 23) Kassambara, A. (2017b). Practical guide to principal component methods in R: PCA, M(CA), FAMD, MFA, HCPC, factoextra, Vol. 2. Lyon, France: Statistical Tools for High-throughput Data Analysis Platform (STHDA).
24. 24) Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2020). Factoextra R package software: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses (Version 1.0.7). Lyon, France: Statistical Tools for High-throughput Data Analysis Platform (STHDA).
25. 25) Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: A package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i0110.18637/jss.v025.i01 ↗
26. 26) Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Xiang, X., Zhang, Q., Yuan, F., Wang, Z., Yao, N., & Zhou, C. (2024). Rural integrated sanitation assessment at community level in Chongqing, China—A cluster analysis. Ecological Indicators, 165, 112226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.11222610.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112226 ↗
27. 27) Masaka, K., Sato, T., & Tanahashi, I. (2013). Use of honey source trees in apiculture: Diversity and regionality in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, 95(1), 15-22. (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.4005/jjfs.95.1510.4005/jjfs.95.15 ↗
28. 28) Maugeri, A., Barchitta, M., Basile, G., & Agodi, A. (2021). Applying a hierarchical clustering on principal components approach to identify different patterns of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic across Italian regions. Scientific Reports, 11, 7082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86703-310.1038/s41598-021-86703-3 ↗
29. 29) Moretti, L., Di Mascio, P., & Bellagamba, S. (2017). Environmental, human health and socio-economic effects of cement powders: The multicriteria analysis as decisional methodology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(6), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1406064510.3390/ijerph14060645 ↗
30. 30) Naik, T. R. (2008). Sustainability of concrete construction. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 13(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:2(98)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:2(98) ↗
31. 31) Nielsen, C. V., & Glavind, M. (2007). Danish experiences with a decade of green concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 5(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.5.310.3151/jact.5.3 ↗
32. 32) Noiva, K., Fernández, J. E., & Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2016). Cluster analysis of urban water supply and demand: Toward large-scale comparative sustainability planning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 484-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.00310.1016/j.scs.2016.06.003 ↗
33. 33) OECD. (2019). Global material resources outlook to 2060: Economic drivers and environmental consequences. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en10.1787/9789264307452-en ↗
34. 34) Opon, J., & Henry, M. (2019). An indicator framework for quantifying the sustainability of concrete materials from the perspectives of global sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 718-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.22010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.220 ↗
35. 35) Orozco, C., Tangtermsirikul, S., Sugiyama, T., & Babel, S. (2023). Examining the endpoint impacts, challenges, and opportunities of fly ash utilization for sustainable concrete construction. Scientific Reports, 13, 18254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45632-z10.1038/s41598-023-45632-z ↗
36. 36) Osmani, M. (2011). Construction wastes. In: T. M. Letcher & D. A. Vallero, Eds. Wastes: A handbook for management. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
37. 37) R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [online]. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: < https://www.R-project.org/ >.
38. 38) Roullier-Gall, C., Signoret, J., Coelho, C., Hemmler, D., Kajdan, M., Lucio, M., Schäfer, B., Gougeon, R. D., & Schmitt-Kopplin, P. (2020). Influence of regionality and maturation time on the chemical fingerprint of whisky. Food Chemistry, 323(1), 126748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12674810.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126748 ↗
39. 39) Sa’adi, Z., Shahid, S., & Shiru, M. S. (2021). Defining climate zone of Borneo based on cluster analysis. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 145, 1467-1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03701-110.1007/s00704-021-03701-1 ↗
40. 40) Sakai, K. (2005). Environmental design for concrete structures. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 3(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.3.1710.3151/jact.3.17 ↗
41. 41) Sakai, K., & Noguchi, T. (2013). The sustainable use of concrete. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
42. 42) Salvia, A. L., Filho, W. L., Brandli, L. L., & Griebeler, J. S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to sustainable development goals: Local and global issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.24210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242 ↗
43. 43) United Nations. (2025). Sustainable development goals: Goal 10 [online]. New York, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available from: < https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal10 >.
44. 44) Villagrán-Zaccardi, Y., Pareja, R., Rojas, L., Irassar, E. F., Torres-Acosta, A., Tobón, J., & John, V. M. (2022). Overview of cement and concrete production in Latin America and the Caribbean with a focus on the goals of reaching carbon neutrality. RILEM Technical Letters, 7, 30-46. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2022.15510.21809/rilemtechlett.2022.155 ↗
45. 45) Vios, N. A. K., Henry, M., & Opon, J. (2022). Quantifying uncertainties in the sustainability evaluation of concrete materials considering regional characteristics in Japan. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 33, 631-637. https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2022.33.063110.14311/APP.2022.33.0631 ↗
46. 46) World Cement Association. (2024). White paper: WCA long term forecast for cement and clinker demand [online]. London, World Cement Association. Available from: < https://www.worldcementassociation.org/images/download-selector/Articles/WCA%20Whitepaper.pdf >.
47. 47) Zadeh, S. S., Joushideh, N., Bahrami, B., & Niyafard, S. (2023). A review on concrete recycling. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(2), 784-793. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.2.163110.30574/wjarr.2023.19.2.1631 ↗