Double-Counting Problem of FEA with Simultaneous Use of Bond Link Elements and Tension-Stiffening Model
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an analytical investigation of the double-counting problem in finite element analyses in which bond link elements, discrete reinforcement elements, and tension-stiffening models are used simultaneously. Engineers and researchers often use the bond link elements in the FEA to express bond slip between reinforcing bar and concrete. On the other hand, in case of smeared crack modeling, bond behavior is indirectly expressed by a tension-stiffening model of concrete. If the bond link elements and tension-stiffening models are used simultaneously, there is some concern that the effect of the bond is double counted. Hence, example uniaxial tension specimens are analyzed by three different analysis methods to investigate the double-counting effect. (1) Smeared crack analyses present no double-counting effect while (2) discrete crack analyses cause the double counting of tensile concrete stresses and result in over cracking. (3) Discrete crack analyses with delayed cracking also cause double counting although over cracking does not occur but the tension-stiffening relationships are overestimated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Engineering Mechanics and Energy, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
School of Management, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi, Japan.
References (8)
Show source-provided references
1. Kanakubo, T., Sato, Y., Uchida, Y., Watanabe, K. and Shima, H., (2012). “Japan Concrete Institute TC activities on bond behavior and constitutive laws in RC (Part 3 Application of Constitutive Laws for FEA).&rdquo
2. Proceedings of Bond in Concrete 2012, Brescia, Italy, 1, 105-112.
3. Ko, H. and Sato, Y., (2004). “Analysis of FRP-strengthened RC members with varied sheet bond stress-slip models.” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2(3), 317-326.10.3151/jact.2.317 ↗
4. Naganuma, K., Yonezawa, K., Kurimoto, O. and Eto, H., (2004). “Simulation of nonlinear dynamic response of reinforced concrete scaled model using three-dimensional finite element method.” Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Eng. (WCEE 13), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 586.
5. Ngo, D. and Scordelis, A. C., (1967). “Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams.” Journal of ACI, 64(3), 152-163.
6. Sato, Y. and Vecchio, F. J., (2003). “Tension stiffening and crack formation in reinforced concrete members with fiber-reinforced polymer sheets.” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(6), 717-724.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(717) ↗
7. Sato, Y. and Ko, H., (2008). “Modeling of reinforcement buckling in RC columns confined with FRP.” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 6(1), 195-204.10.3151/jact.6.195 ↗
8. Yamato, N. and Kanakubo, T., (2009). “Prediction method of crack width in reinforced concrete members Part 1: Theoretical solution by the bi-linear model of bond constitutive law.” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Architectural Institute of Japan, 74(640), 1137-1143.10.3130/aijs.74.1137 ↗