journal article·2009-06-30Open access

Seismic Testing and Performance of Precast High-Strength Concrete Beam-Column Joints Subjected to High Axial Tension

Hassane Ousalem, Hiroto Takatsu, Yuji Ishikawa, Hideki Kimura

Abstract

High-rise buildings are subjected during severe earthquakes and strong winds to intensive large axial and lateral loads, particularly at their lower stories, where the exterior columns experience varying high axial loads. Herein, the seismic performance of two precast high-strength reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints subjected to different varying high-axial levels is investigated while premature shear failure is generally suspected. High-grade steel bars were used for reinforcement. Splice grout-sleeves and mechanical anchors were used in the columns and beams, respectively. The strength of the concrete was 70 MPa. The maximum axial tension level in columns was 90% of the yield strength of the main bars. Under high axial tension, the tested subassemblies exhibited stable response, good damping characteristics, appropriate lateral force resistance and energy absorption capacity. They performed well within the lateral story drift angle of 3% where the successive failure modes (beam/column flexural yielding followed by joint shear failure) confirmed the appropriateness of the design equations in AIJ and ACI regulations. Furthermore, the use of mechanical anchors proved to be very effective and no sign of concrete crushing (pushing toward the exterior face of the joint) was observed within the lateral story drift angle of 2%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research and Development Institute, Takenaka Corporation, Japan.

Tokyo Head Office, Takenaka Corporation, Japan.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI (2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete (318-02) and commentary (318R-02).” American Concrete Institute.
2. AIJ (1990). “Ultimate strength and deformation capacity of buildings in seismic design.” Architectural Institute of Japan. (Japanese)
3. AIJ (1999a). “AIJ standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structures based on allowable stress concept- revised 1999.” Architecture Institute of Japan. (in Japanese)
4. AIJ (1999b). “Design guidelines for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete buildings based on inelastic displacement concept.” Architectural Institute of Japan. (in Japanese)
5. BD (2003). “Code of practice for precast concrete construction.” Buildings Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region.
6. Chun, S. C., Lee, T. H. K., Oh, B. and Wallace, J. W. (2007). “Mechanical anchorage in exterior beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading.” ACI Structural Journal, 104(1), 102-112.
7. GBRC (2006). “Design guideline of R/C beam-column joints using mechanical anchorages.” General Building Research Corporation of Japan.
8. Ghosh, S. K. and Hawkins, N. M. (2003). “Codification of PRESSS structural systems.” PCI Journal, 48(4), 40-143.
9. Hawkins, N. M. and Ghosh, S. K. (2004). “Requirements for the use of PRESSS moment-resisting frame systems.” PCI Journal, 49(2), 98-103.10.15554/pcij.03012004.98.103 ↗
10. Hieber, D. G., Wacker, J. M., Eberhard, M. O. and Stanton, J. F. (2005). “State-of-the-art on precast systems for rapid construction of bridges.” Technical Report for Washington State Transportation Commission, Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Washington.
11. Khaloo, A. R. and Parastesh, H. (2003). “Cyclic loading response of simple moment-resisting precast concrete beam-column connection.” ACI Structural Journal, 100(4), 440-445.
12. Khoo, J., Li, B. and Yip, W. K. (2003). “Tests on precast concrete frames with connections constructed away from column faces.” ACI Structural Journal, 103(1), 18-27.
13. Miller, R. A., Castrodale, R., Mirmiran, A. and Hastak, M. (2004). “Connection of simple precast concrete girders for continuity.” Report 519, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
14. PCI (1997). “Parking structures: Recommended practice for design and construction.” Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
15. Stone, W. C., Cheok, G. S. and Stanton, J. F. (1995). “Performance of hybrid moment-resisting precast beam-column concrete connections subjected to cyclic loading.” ACI Structural Journal, 91(2), 229-249.