journal article·2019-04

CFD simulation of the effects of a suspension section on the hydrodynamics of a circulating fluidized bed

Cenfan Liu, Nan Zhang, Wei Wang

Particuology· Volume 43
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Gas–solid two-phase flow in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) is affected by operating conditions (e.g., superficial gas velocity, solids inventory), material properties and geometric factors, such as the entry and exit configuration. In particular, the suspension section, which is located between the riser bottom and the solids recycle inlet, affects the hydrodynamics in the riser significantly. However, the suspension section has received less attention compared with other geometric factors. Most computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, especially two-dimensional simulations do not take this factor into account. We performed three-dimensional, full-loop CFD simulations with a drag coefficient that was determined by the energy-minimization multi-scale model, and investigated the flow behavior of two CFBs with different suspension-section lengths. The simulation results revealed that the axial profiles of voidage in the riser with a longer suspension section are more likely S-shaped, whereas those with shorter suspension sections decay exponentially. The dependences of solids flux on solids inventory differ in the two CFBs. A shorter suspension section may result in a smooth transition from dilute to dense transport without intermediate accumulative choking, whereas a longer suspension section may lead to a choking transition. These simulation results are qualitatively consistent with the flow behaviors described in literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Numerical approach for modeling particle transport phenomena in a closed loop of a circulating fluidized bed10.1016/j.partic.2015.12.006 ↗
2. Coarse-grid simulation of gas–particle flows in vertical risers10.1021/ie0492193 ↗
3. The axial distribution of the cross-sectionally averaged voidage in fast fluidized beds10.1016/0032-5910(92)88003-Z ↗
4. An analysis of loop seal operations in a circulating fluidized bed10.1205/026387600528102 ↗
5. Numerical analysis of a reacting gas/solid flow in the riser section of an industrial fluid catalytic cracking unit10.2202/1542-6580.1024 ↗
6. End effects in circulating fluidized bed hydrodynamics
7. PEPT study of particle motion for different riser exit geometries10.1016/j.partic.2010.08.006 ↗
8. Effect of pressure on loop seal operation for a pressurized circulating fluidized bed10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00018-2 ↗
9. Inlet and outlet effects on flow patterns in gas–solid risers10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00030-8 ↗
10. Numerical simulation of complex particle–fluid flows10.1016/j.powtec.2007.06.017 ↗
11. A multiscale mass transfer model for gas–solid riser flows: Part II—Sub-grid simulation of ozone decomposition10.1016/j.ces.2008.01.039 ↗
12. Gidaspow · 1994
13. High-velocity fluidized bed reactors10.1016/0009-2509(90)80070-U ↗
14. Riser geometry influence on CFB particle and fluid dynamics
15. Evaluation of the gas–solid suspension density in CFB risers with exit effects10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00199-0 ↗
16. Influence of exit geometry in circulating fluidized-bed risers10.1002/aic.690490107 ↗
17. A structure-dependent multi-fluid model (SFM) for heterogeneous gas–solid flow10.1016/j.ces.2013.05.050 ↗
18. An EMMS-based multi-fluid model (EFM) for heterogeneous gas–solid riser flows: Part I. formulation of structure-dependent conservation equations10.1016/j.ces.2012.03.022 ↗
19. On the nature of turbulent and fast fluidized beds10.1016/0032-5910(92)80058-5 ↗
20. A generalized bubble diameter correlation for gas–solid fluidized beds10.1002/aic.690331113 ↗
21. The influence of exit structures on the axial distribution of voidage in fast fluidized bed
22. Kunii · 1991
23. Rotational asymmetry of reactant concentration and its evolution in a circulating fluidized bed riser10.1016/j.partic.2012.03.012 ↗
24. MP–PIC simulation of CFB riser with EMMS-based drag model10.1016/j.ces.2012.07.020 ↗
25. Focusing on mesoscales: From the energy-minimization multiscale model to mesoscience10.1016/j.coche.2016.07.008 ↗
26. Li · 2013
27. Li · 1994
28. Hydrodynamics
29. The dynamics of fast fluidization
30. 3D CFD simulation of a circulating fluidized bed with on-line adjustment of mechanical valve10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.006 ↗
31. Searching for a mesh-independent sub-grid model for CFD simulation of gas–solid riser flows10.1016/j.ces.2009.04.024 ↗
32. 3-D full-loop simulation of an industrial-scale circulating fluidized-bed boiler10.1002/aic.13917 ↗
33. Kinetic theories for granular flow: Inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield10.1017/S0022112084000586 ↗
34. Numerical comparison of two modes of gas–solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor10.1016/j.partic.2016.05.007 ↗
35. Ozone decomposition in a 0.254m diameter circulating fluidized bed reactor10.1016/0032-5910(93)80010-8 ↗
36. Challenge problem: 1. Model validation of circulating fluidized beds10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.010 ↗
37. Axial and radial solids distribution in a long and high-flux CFB riser10.1002/aic.690471007 ↗
38. Exit effects in circulating fluidized bed risers10.1002/cjce.5450750602 ↗
39. Effect of riser exit geometry on bed hydrodynamics and heat transfer in a circulating fluidized bed riser column10.1002/1099-114X(200101)25:1<1::AID-ER659>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
40. Modeling of methanol to olefins (MTO) process in a circulating fluidized bed reactor10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00182-4 ↗
41. A quantitative definition and flow regime diagram for fast fluidization10.1016/0032-5910(86)80115-2 ↗
42. Structure-dependent analysis of energy dissipation in gas–solid flows: Beyond nonequilibrium thermodynamics10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.037 ↗
43. Cluster patterns in circulating fluidized beds predicted by numerical simulation (discrete particle model versus two-fluid model)10.1016/S0032-5910(97)03349-4 ↗
44. Simulation of gas–solid two-phase flow by a multi-scale CFD approach—Extension of the EMMS model to the sub-grid level10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.017 ↗
45. Choking and flow regime transitions: Simulation by a multi-scale CFD approach10.1016/j.ces.2006.10.010 ↗
46. The characterisrics of cluster in a high density circulating fluidized bed10.1002/cjce.5450730508 ↗
47. Effects of using two-versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds: Part I, hydrodynamics10.1016/j.powtec.2007.07.005 ↗
48. Effects of using two-versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds: Part II, budget analysis10.1016/j.powtec.2007.09.014 ↗
49. Choosing structure-dependent drag coefficient in modeling gas–solid two-phase flow10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60098-0 ↗
50. Simulation of heterogeneous structure in a circulating fluidized-bed riser by combining the two-fluid model with the EMMS approach10.1021/ie049773c ↗
51. Yang · 2003
52. “Choking” revisited10.1021/ie0307479 ↗
53. Gas–solids flow behavior: CFB riser vs. downer10.1002/aic.690470911 ↗
54. Virtual experimentation through 3D full-loop simulation of a circulating fluidized bed10.1016/j.partic.2008.07.013 ↗
55. 3D CFD simulation of hydrodynamics of a 150MWe circulating fluidized bed boiler10.1016/j.cej.2010.06.033 ↗
56. CFD study of exit effect of high-density CFB risers with EMMS-based two-fluid model10.1016/j.ces.2015.05.032 ↗