journal article·2018-10

Capture efficiency of coal/biomass co-combustion ash in an electrostatic field

Jianyi Lu, Lili Fu, Ximei Li, Eric Eddings

Particuology· Volume 40
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ash samples from corn stalk and coal co-fired at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 100% biomass were collected by a 4-stage wire-pipe type electrostatic precipitator (ESP), and the ratio of 14C/12C in ash samples from the 0%, 20%, and 100% co-firing scenarios were measured by an accelerator mass spectrometer. The differential capture efficiency in electrostatic fields for coal ash, coal/biomass co-combustion ash (co-ash), and pure biomass ash was studied separately based on the ratio 14C/12C. Other factors that may influence capture efficiency were analyzed, including microscopic morphology, resistivity, dust density, and particle size distribution. The results indicate that co-ash may be efficiently captured by ESP, while pure biomass ash could not. Co-ash capture was mainly concentrated in the first two electrostatic fields in the lab-scale ESP, and the overall capture efficiency exceeded 90%. Biomass addition decreased the resistivity of co-ash, and enhanced its surface adsorption capacity to form agglomerates, facilitating the capture of co-ash. The capture efficiency of coal ash in co-ash was higher than that of pure coal ash in the first electrostatic field of the ESP. Co-firing biomass can aid the removal of both coal ash and biomass ash when using an ESP.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.035 ↗
2. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) · 2007
3. Modeling and economic evaluation of the integration of carbon capture and storage technologies into coal to liquids plants10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.008 ↗
4. Energy overview for globalized world economy: Source, supply chain and sink10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.151 ↗
5. Co-firing of pulverized coal with Pinion Pine/Juniper wood in raw: torrefied and pyrolyzed forms10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.11.020 ↗
6. GB/T 1574 · 2007
7. GB/T 16913 · 2008
8. Evaluation of 14C abundance in soil respiration using acclerator mass spectrometry10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.11.005 ↗
9. Investigation on the production of biomass and coal in Finland and Britain
10. Experimental studies on charging and electric field characteristics of biomass/coal co-combustion ash10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.102 ↗
11. Stable carbon and radiocarbon isotope compositions of particle size fractions to determine origins of sedimentary organic matter in an estuary10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00060-8 ↗
12. Carbon-14 based determination of the biogenic fraction of industrial CO 2 emissions–application and validation10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.004 ↗
13. Constraining carbonaceous aerosol sources in a receptor model by including 14C data with redox species, organic tracers, and elemental/organic carbon measurements10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.062 ↗
14. Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends10.1016/S0360-1285(00)00020-4 ↗
15. Investigations on sulfur and carbon isotopic compositions of potential polluted sources in atmospheric PM2.5 in Nanjing region
16. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO10.1017/S0033822200056988 ↗
17. Discussion reporting of 14C data10.1017/S0033822200003672 ↗
18. Coal chemical industry and its sustainable development in China10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.029 ↗
19. Xu · 2008
20. Wet deposition of fossil and non-fossil derived particulate carbon: Insights from radiocarbon measurement10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.005 ↗
21. Micro-scale (μg) radiocarbon analysis of water-soluble organic carbon in aerosol samples10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.059 ↗