journal article·2019-12Open access

Effects of loading contact on electric-power generation of lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramic plate

Mitsuhiro Okayasu, Tsukasa Ogawa

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 8· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract To better understand the generation of electric power for piezoelectric PbZrTiO3 (PZT) ceramic plate (ϕ25 mm), an attempt was made to investigate experimentally and numerically electric- power generation characteristics during cyclic bending under various loading fixtures (ϕ0–ϕ20 mm), i.e., different contact areas. Increasing the load-contact area on the PZT ceramic leads to a nonlinear decrease in the generated voltage. Decreasing contact area basically enhances the generated voltage, although the voltage saturates during loading when the contact area is less than ϕ5 mm. A similar voltage is generated for ϕ0 and ϕ5 mm, which is attributed to strain status (ratio of compressive and tensile strain) and material failure due to different stress distribution in the PZT ceramic. On the basis of the obtained electric generation voltage, suitable loading conditions are clarified by loading with the ϕ5 mm fixture, which generates a higher voltage and a longer lifetime of the PZT ceramic. From this approach, it is appeared that the area contact with the area ratio of 0.04 (ϕ5 mm/ϕ20 mm) is suitable to obtain the high efficiency of the electric voltage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Priya S. Advances in energy harvesting using low profile piezoelectric transducers. J Electroceram 2007, 19: 167–184.10.1007/s10832-007-9043-4 ↗
2. Sodano HA, Park G, Inman DJ. Estimation of electric charge output for piezoelectric energy harvesting. Strain 2004, 40: 49–58.10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.00120.x ↗
3. Cook-Chennault KA, Thambi N, Sastry AM. Powering MEMS portable devices—a review of non-regenerative and regenerative power supply systems with special emphasis on piezoelectric energy harvesting systems. Smart Mater Struct 2008, 17: 043001.10.1088/0964-1726/17/4/043001 ↗
4. Sodano HA, Inman DJ, Park G. Comparison of piezoelectric energy harvesting devices for recharging batteries. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2005, 16: 799–807.10.1177/1045389X05056681 ↗
5. Tadesse Y, Zhang SJ, Priya S. Multimodal energy harvesting system: piezoelectric and electromagnetic. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2009, 20: 625–632.10.1177/1045389X08099965 ↗
6. Shu YC, Lien IC. Efficiency of energy conversion for a piezoelectric power harvesting system. J Micromech Microeng 2006, 16: 2429–2438.10.1088/0960-1317/16/11/026 ↗
7. Okayasu M, Sato D, Sato Y, et al. A study of the effects of vibration on the electric power generation properties of lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramic. Ceram Int 2012, 38: 4445–4451.10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.018 ↗
8. Okayasu M, Watanabe K. The electric power generation characteristics of a lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramic under various cyclic loading conditions. Ceram Int 2015, 41: 15097–15102.10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.076 ↗
9. Partridge J, Abouelamaimen DI. The role of supercapacitors in regenerative braking systems. Energies 2019, 12: 2683.10.3390/en12142683 ↗
10. Okayasu M, Watanabe K. A study of the electric power generation properties of a lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramic. Ceram Int 2016, 42: 14049–14060.10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.012 ↗
11. Okayasu M, Yamasaki T. Effects of 90° domain switching on electric generation properties of PZT ceramic. Ceram Int 2017, 43: 3590–3600.10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.196 ↗
12. Cuadras A, Romero R, Ovejas VJ. Entropy characterisation of overstressed capacitors for lifetime prediction. J Power Sources 2016, 336: 272–278.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.077 ↗
13. Hsiao CC, Liang BH. The generated entropy monitored by pyroelectric sensors. Sensors 2018, 18: 3320.10.3390/s18103320 ↗