journal article·2021-04Open access

Hydrous cerium oxides coated glass fiber for efficient and long-lasting arsenic removal from drinking water

Ronghui Li, Weiyi Yang, Shuang Gao, Jianku Shang, Qi Li

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 10· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract A novel arsenic adsorbent with hydrous cerium oxides coated on glass fiber cloth (HCO/GFC) was synthesized. The HCO/GFC adsorbents were rolled into a cartridge for arsenic removal test. Due to the large pores between the glass fibers, the arsenic polluted water can flow through easily. The arsenic removal performance was evaluated by testing the equilibrium adsorption isotherm, adsorption kinetics, and packed-bed operation. The pH effects on arsenic removal were conducted. The test results show that HCO/GFC filter has high As(V) and As(III) removal capacity even at low equilibrium concentration. The more toxic As(III) in water can be easily removed within a wide range of solution pH without pre-treatment. Arsenic contaminated ground-water from Yangzong Lake (China) was used in the column test. At typical breakthrough conditions (the empty bed contact time, EBCT = 2 min), arsenic researched breakthrough at over 24,000 bed volumes (World Health Organization (WHO) suggested that the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water is 10 mg/L). The Ce content in the treated water was lower than 5 ppb during the column test, which showed that cerium did not leach from the HCO/GFC material into the treated water. The relationship between dosage of adsorbents and the adsorption kinetic model was also clarified, which suggested that the pseudo second order model could fit the kinetic experimental data better when the adsorbent loading was relatively low, and the pseudo first order model could fit the kinetic experimental data better when the adsorbent loading amount was relatively high.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Arsenic contamination and mitigation · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Huling JR, Huling SG, Ludwig R. Enhanced adsorption of arsenic through the oxidative treatment of reduced aquifer solids. Water Res 2017, 123: 183–191.10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.064 ↗
2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. 3rd edn. Geneva: WHO Press, 2008: 306.
3. Jadhav SV, Bringas E, Yadav GD, et al. Arsenic and fluoride contaminated groundwaters: A review of current technologies for contaminants removal. J Environ Manag 2015, 162: 306–325.10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.020 ↗
4. Kim Y, Kim C, Choi I, et al. Arsenic removal using mesoporous alumina prepared via a templating method. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38: 924–931.10.1021/es0346431 ↗
5. Xu ZC, Li Q, Gao SA, et al. As(III) removal by hydrous titanium dioxide prepared from one-step hydrolysis of aqueous TiCl(4) solution. Water Res 2010, 44: 5713–5721.10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.051 ↗
6. Lin S, Lu DN, Liu Z. Removal of arsenic contaminants with magnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 2012, 211–212: 46–52.10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.018 ↗
7. Sun TY, Zhao ZW, Liang ZJ, et al. Efficient As(III) removal by magnetic CuO-Fe3O4 nanoparticles through photo-oxidation and adsorption under light irradiation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2017, 495: 168–177.10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.104 ↗
8. Reddy KJ, McDonald KJ, King H. A novel arsenic removal process for water using cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 2013, 397: 96–102.10.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.041 ↗
9. Cui H, Su Y, Li Q, et al. Exceptional arsenic (III, V) removal performance of highly porous, nanostructured ZrO2 spheres for fixed bed reactors and the full-scale system modeling. Water Res 2013, 47: 6258–6268.10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.040 ↗
10. Lata S, Samadder SR. Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: A review. J Environ Manag 2016, 166: 387–406.10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.039 ↗
11. Zhang L, Qin YH, Chen BZ, et al. Catalytic reduction of SO2 by CO over CeO2-TiO2 mixed oxides. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 2016, 26: 2960–2965.10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64426-6 ↗
12. Li P, Chen XY, Li YD, et al. A review on oxygen storage capacity of CeO2-based materials: Influence factors, measurement techniques, and applications in reactions related to catalytic automotive emissions control. Catal Today 2019, 327: 90–115.10.1016/j.cattod.2018.05.059 ↗
13. Ackland K, Coey JMD. Room temperature magnetism in CeO2—A review. Phys Rep 2018, 746: 1–39.10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.002 ↗
14. Hristovski KD, Westerhoff PK, Crittenden JC, et al. Arsenate removal by nanostructured ZrO2 spheres. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42: 3786–3790.10.1021/es702952p ↗
15. Raichur AM, Jyoti Basu M. Adsorption of fluoride onto mixed rare earth oxides. Sep Purif Technol 2001, 24: 121–127.10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00219-7 ↗
16. Xiao HY, Ai ZH, Zhang LZ. Non aqueous sol-gel synthesized hierarchical CeO2 nanocrystal microspheres as novel adsorbents for wastewater treatment. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 16625–16630.10.1021/jp9050269 ↗
17. Haron MJ, Ab Rahim F, Abdullah AH, et al. Sorption removal of arsenic by cerium-exchanged zeolite P. Mater Sci Eng: B 2008, 149: 204–208.10.1016/j.mseb.2007.11.028 ↗
18. Peng XJ, Luan ZK, Ding J, et al. Ceria nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes for the removal of arsenate from water. Mater Lett 2005, 59: 399–403.10.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.090 ↗
19. Xu WH, Wang J, Wang L, et al. Enhanced arsenic removal from water by hierarchically porous CeO2-ZrO2 nanospheres: Role of surface- and structure-dependent properties. J Hazard Mater 2013, 260: 498–507.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.010 ↗
20. Li RH, Li Q, Gao SA, et al. Exceptional arsenic adsorption performance of hydrous cerium oxide nanoparticles: Part A. Adsorption capacity and mechanism. Chem Eng J 2012, 185–186: 127–135.10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.061 ↗
21. Suzuki TM, Bomani JO, Matsunaga H, et al. Preparation of porous resin loaded with crystalline hydrous zirconium oxide and its application to the removal of arsenic. React Funct Polym 2000, 43: 165–172.10.1016/S1381-5148(99)00038-3 ↗
22. Sun WZ, Li Q, Gao SA, et al. Exceptional arsenic adsorption performance of hydrous cerium oxide nanoparticles: Part B. Integration with silica monoliths and dynamic treatment. Chem Eng J 2012, 185–186: 136–143.10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.060 ↗
23. Chen JH, Liu PS, Cheng W. PBA-loaded albite-base ceramic foam in application to adsorb harmful ions of Cd, Cs and As(V) in water. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct 2019, 15: 659–672.10.1108/MMMS-07-2018-0140 ↗
24. Liu PS, Cui G, Guo YJ, et al. A novel sort of porous ceramic foam ball with modified surface for arsenic removal from aqueous solution. J Iron Steel Res Int 2017, 24: 661–668.10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30099-7 ↗
25. Padungthon S, Li JZ, German M, et al. Hybrid anion exchanger with dispersed zirconium oxide nanoparticles: A durable and reusable fluoride-selective sorbent. Environ Eng Sci 2014, 31: 360–372.10.1089/ees.2013.0412 ↗
26. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 2002, 17: 517–568.10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5 ↗
27. Banerjee K, Amy GL, Prevost M, et al. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res 2008, 42: 3371–3378.10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.019 ↗
28. Deng SB, Yu G, Xie SH, et al. Enhanced adsorption of arsenate on the aminated fibers: Sorption behavior and uptake mechanism. Langmuir 2008, 24: 10961–10967.10.1021/la8023138 ↗
29. Suresh Kumar P, Korving L, Keesman KJ, et al. Effect of pore size distribution and particle size of porous metal oxides on phosphate adsorption capacity and kinetics. Chem Eng J 2019, 358: 160–169.10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.202 ↗
30. Ho YS, McKay G. The sorption of lead(II) ions on peat. Water Res 1999, 33: 578–584.10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00207-3 ↗
31. Ho Y, McKay G. The kinetics of sorption of divalent metal ions onto sphagnum moss peat. Water Res 2000, 34: 735–742.10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00232-8 ↗
32. Ho YS, McKay G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 1999, 34: 451–465.10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 ↗
33. Martinson CA, Reddy KJ. Adsorption of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) by cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 2009, 336: 406–411.10.1016/j.jcis.2009.04.075 ↗
34. Zhang Y, Yang M, Dou XM, et al. Arsenate adsorption on an Fe-Ce bimetal oxide adsorbent: Role of surface properties. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39: 7246–7253.10.1021/es050775d ↗
35. Goldberg S, Johnston CT. Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 2001, 234: 204–216.10.1006/jcis.2000.7295 ↗