Tensile strength and damage of open-cell ceramic foams under cylindrical splitting test
Source abstract
Abstract
To widen the understanding of tensile failure of reticulated ceramic foams and expand the available mechanical method, a cylindrical splitting test is developed in the present study based on the alumina open-cell foams of three different pore densities. The biaxial method is validated by the characterization of mechanical parameters and the in-situ fracture process by digital image correlation, followed by a formula correction for effective tensile strength with the consideration of discrete crack paths. For the experimental setup curved loading platens, compliant pad and intermediate quasi-static loading rate are proposed for guaranteeing the tensile failure under radial compressive load. Tensile strength, fracture energy as well as brittleness increase with the foam pore density and the fracture behavior is the balanced result of material and foam structural support strength. An analytical model of splitting tensile strength with structural parameters is derived, which implies its dependence on the cell size and critical stress intensity factor of strut material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. X Liang. The enhanced thermal shock resistance and combustion efficiency of SiC reticulated porous ceramics via the construction of multi-layer coating. 2023, 49: 9097-9103.10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.068 ↗
2. LY Wang. High-strength porous alumina ceramics prepared from stable wet foams. 2021, 10: 852-859.10.1007/s40145-021-0479-9 ↗
3. QB Wen. Si-based polymer-derived ceramics for energy conversion and storage. 2022, 11: 197-246.10.1007/s40145-021-0562-2 ↗
4. SL Chen. Microstructure and properties of porous Si 3N 4 ceramics by gel casting-self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS). 2022, 11: 172-183.10.1007/s40145-021-0525-7 ↗
5. A Herdering. Additive manufactured polyamide foams with periodic grid as templates for the production of functional coated carbon-bonded alumina foam filters. 2019, 45: 153-159.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.146 ↗
6. T Wetzig. Carbon-bonded alumina spaghetti filters by alginate-based robo gel casting. 2020, 22.10.1002/adem.201900657 ↗
7. M Abendroth. An approach toward numerical investigation of the mechanical behavior of ceramic foams during metal melt filtration processes. 2017, 19.10.1002/adem.201700080 ↗
8. J Yang. Effect of calcium treatment on non-metallic inclusions in ultra-low oxygen steel refined by high basicity high Al 2O 3 slag. 2011, 18: 8-14.10.1016/S1006-706X(11)60083-6 ↗
9. R Fritzsch. 201310.1002/9781118663189.ch165 ↗
10. O Jankovský. Nano-functionalization of carbon-bonded alumina using graphene oxide and MWCNTs. 2018, 38: 4732-4738.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.068 ↗
11. C Voigt. Characterization of reticulated ceramic foams with mercury intrusion porosimetry and mercury probe atomic force microscopy. 2018, 44: 22963-22975.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.094 ↗
12. S Brehm. Raman spectroscopic characterization of environmentally friendly binder systems for carbon-bonded filters. 2022, 24.10.1002/adem.202100544 ↗
13. K Schwartzwalder. Method of making porous ceramic articles
14. H Zielke. Influence of carbon content and coking temperature on the biaxial flexural strength of carbon-bonded alumina at elevated temperatures. 2020, 159: 324-332.10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.042 ↗
15. H Jelitto. Automated control of stable crack growth for R-curve measurements in brittle materials. 2013, 53: 163-170.10.1007/s11340-012-9622-4 ↗
16. LJ Gibson. 199710.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
17. C D’Angelo. Finite element analysis of reticulated ceramics under compression. 2012, 60: 6692-6702.10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.039 ↗
18. MF Ashby. The mechanical properties of cellular solids. 1983, 14: 1755-1769.10.1007/BF02645546 ↗
19. S Meille. Mechanical properties of porous ceramics in compression: On the transition between elastic, brittle, and cellular behavior. 2012, 32: 3959-3967.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.05.006 ↗
20. T Fey. Reticulated replica ceramic foams: Processing, functionalization, and characterization. 2017, 19.10.1002/adem.201700369 ↗
21. JS Morgan. Cell size effects on the strength of foamed glass. 1981, 47: 37-42.10.1016/0025-5416(81)90038-0 ↗
22. CQ Dam. Compressive behavior and deformation-mode map of an open cell alumina. 1990, 5: 163-171.10.1557/JMR.1990.0163 ↗
23. R Brezny. The effect of cell size on the mechanical behavior of cellular materials. 1990, 38: 2517-2526.10.1016/0956-7151(90)90263-G ↗
24. W Winter. Strukturphänomene bei der biegung mit stoffmodellen der kontinuierlichen schädigung. 1994, 74: T192-T195.
25. J Grabenhorst. Influence of the measurement method and sample dimensions on the Young’s modulus of open porous alumina foam structures. 2019, 45: 5987-5995.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.069 ↗
26. BSM Seeber. Mechanical properties of highly porous alumina foams. 2013, 28: 2281-2287.10.1557/jmr.2013.102 ↗
27. C Voigt. The influence of the measurement parameters on the crushing strength of reticulated ceramic foams. 2013, 28: 2288-2299.10.1557/jmr.2013.96 ↗
28. M Neumann. On the fracture statistics of open-porous alumina foam structures. 2022, 42: 2331-2340.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.12.034 ↗
29. R Brezny. Uniaxial strength behavior of brittle cellular materials. 1993, 76: 2185-2192.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07753.x ↗
30. JF Despois. Tensile behaviour of replicated aluminium foams. 2004, 6: 444-447.10.1002/adem.200405155 ↗
31. C Voigt. 202110.1007/978-3-030-65396-5_103 ↗
32. LS Chang. Characterization of alumina ceramics by ultrasonic testing. 2000, 45: 221-226.10.1016/S1044-5803(00)00081-4 ↗
33. YJ Dai. Fracture behaviour of magnesia refractory materials in tension with the Brazilian test. 2019, 39: 5433-5441.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.026 ↗
34. JH Yu. Influence of pressure distribution and friction on determining mechanical properties in the Brazilian test: Theory and experiment. 2019, 161: 11-22.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.002 ↗
35. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7 ↗
36. YJ Dai. Observation and quantification of the fracture process zone for two magnesia refractories with different brittleness. 2017, 37: 2521-2529.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.005 ↗
37. H Bart-Smith. Compressive deformation and yielding mechanisms in cellular Al alloys determined using X-ray tomography and surface strain mapping. 1998, 521: 71-81.10.1557/PROC-521-71 ↗
38. S Grednev. Applicability of correlated digital image correlation and infrared thermography for measuring mesomechanical deformation in foams and auxetics. 2022, 45.10.1002/gamm.202200014 ↗
39. Annual Book of ASTM, Standards · 1984 · 336
40. A Malik. A hybrid approach employing neural networks to simulate the elasto–plastic deformation behavior of 3D-foam structures. 2022, 24.10.1002/adem.202100641 ↗
41. GE Andreev. A review of the Brazilian test for rock tensile strength determination. Part I: Calculation formula. 1991, 13: 445-456.10.1016/0167-9031(91)91006-4 ↗
42. H Lin. Modified formula for the tensile strength as obtained by the flattened Brazilian disk test. 2016, 49: 1579-1586.10.1007/s00603-015-0785-z ↗
43. H Zielke. Determining the fracture toughness of ceramic filter materials using the miniaturized chevron-notched beam method at high temperature. 2018, 44: 13986-13993.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.248 ↗
44. D Munz. 199910.1007/978-3-642-58407-7 ↗