Mechanical and biocompatible properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials for dental restoration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dental restorative materials with high mechanical properties and biocompatible performances are promising. In this work, polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials (PICNs) were fabricated via infiltrating polymerizable monomers into porous ceramic networks and incorporated with hydroxyapatite nano-powders. Our results revealed that the flexural strength can be enhanced up to 157.32 MPa, and elastic modulus and Vickers hardness can be achieved up to 19.4 and 1.31 GPa, respectively, which are comparable with the commercial computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks. Additionally, the adhesion and spreading of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) on the surface of such materials can be improved by adding hydroxyapatite, which results in good biocompatibility. Such PICNs are potential applicants for their application in the dental restoration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Swain MV, Coldea A, Bilkhair A, et al. Interpenetrating network ceramic-resin composite dental restorative materials. Dent Mate. 2016, 32: 34–42.10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.009 ↗
2. He LH, Swain M. A. novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material. Dent Mater. 2011, 27: 527–534.10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.002 ↗
3. Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, et al. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016, 55. 1–11.
4. Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, et al. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology. 2017, 105: 162–169.10.1007/s10266-016-0258-1 ↗
5. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, et al. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016, 115. 71–75.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014 ↗
6. ISO 4049:2009 Dentistry: Polymer-based restorative materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
7. Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992, 7: 1564–1583.10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
8. Cui BC, Li J, Wang HN, et al. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic (sodium aluminum silicate) composites for dental restoration. J Dent. 2017, 62: 91–97.10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.009 ↗
9. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014, 33: 705–710.10.4012/dmj.2014-208 ↗
10. Wang HN, Cui BC, Li J, et al. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of polymer infiltrated sodium aluminum silicate restorative composites. J Adv Ceram. 2017, 6: 73–79.10.1007/s40145-016-0214-0 ↗
11. Chen L, Yu QS, Wang Y, et al. BisGMA/TEGDMA dental composite containing high aspect-ratio hydroxyapatite nanofibers. Dent Mater. 2011, 27: 1187–1195.10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.403 ↗
12. Domingo C, Arcís RW, López-Macipe A, et al. Dental composites reinforced with hydroxyapatite: Mechanical behavior and absorption/elution characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001, 56: 297–305.10.1002/1097-4636(200108)56:2<297::AID-JBM1098>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
13. Santos C, Luklinska ZB, Clarke RL, et al. Hydroxyapatite as a filler for dental composite materials: mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity of composites. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2001, 12: 565–573.
14. Arcís RW, López-Macipe A, Toledano M, et al. Mechanical properties of visible light-cured resins reinforced with hydroxyapatite for dental restoration. Dent Mater. 2002, 18: 49–57.10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00019-7 ↗