Influence of drag laws on pressure and bed material recirculation rate in a cold flow model of an 8 MW dual fluidized bed system by means of CPFD
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A cold flow model of an 8 MW dual fluidized bed (DFB) system is simulated using the commercial computational particle fluid dynamics (CPFD) software package Barracuda. The DFB system comprises a bubbling bed connected to a fast fluidized bed with the bed material circulating between them. As the hydrodynamics in hot DFB plants are complex because of high temperatures and many chemical reaction processes, cold flow models are used. Performing numerical simulations of cold flows enables a focus on the hydrodynamics as the chemistry and heat and mass transfer processes can be put aside. The drag law has a major influence on the hydrodynamics, and therefore its influence on pressure, particle distribution, and bed material recirculation rate is calculated using Barracuda and its results are compared with experimental results. The drag laws used were energy-minimization multiscale (EMMS), Ganser, Turton–Levenspiel, and a combination of Wen–Yu/Ergun. Eleven operating points were chosen for that study and each was calculated with the aforementioned drag laws. The EMMS drag law best predicted the pressure and distribution of the bed material in the different parts of the DFB system. For predicting the bed material recirculation rate, the Ganser drag law showed the best results. However, the drag laws often were not able to predict the experimentally found trends of the bed material recirculation rate. Indeed, the drag law significantly influences the hydrodynamic outcomes in a DFB system and must be chosen carefully to obtain meaningful simulation results. More research may enable recommendations as to which drag law is useful in simulations of a DFB system with CPFD.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. The multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) method for dense particulate flows10.1016/0301-9322(95)00072-0 ↗
2. CPFD simulation of circulating fluidized bed risers10.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.014 ↗
3. Drag on non-spherical particles: An evaluation of available methods10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00178-8 ↗
4. CO2 adsorption loop experiment with Eulerian–Lagrangian simulation10.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.011 ↗
5. A CPFD model for a bubbly biomass–sand fluidized bed10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.005 ↗
6. Influence of the particle size distribution of powders on the velocities of minimum and complete fluidization10.1016/S1385-8947(99)00075-3 ↗
7. Gidaspow · 1994
8. Scaling relationships for fluidized beds10.1016/0009-2509(84)80070-6 ↗
9. Contacting modes and behaviour classification of gas–solid and other two-phase suspensions10.1002/cjce.5450640301 ↗
10. Influence of particle size distribution on the performance of fluidized bed reactors10.1002/cjce.5450690512 ↗
11. Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles10.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-7 ↗
12. Numerical simulation comparison of two reactor configurations for chemical looping combustion and chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling10.1115/1.4033108 ↗
13. Hernández · 2008
14. Multi-fluid CFD modelling of fluidised bed reactors10.2202/1542-6580.1138 ↗
15. Biomass CHP plant Güssing―A success story
16. 2250-h long term operation of a water gas shift pilot plant processing tar-rich product gas from an industrial scale dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasification plant10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.137 ↗
17. Fluid-dynamic investigations in a scaled cold model for a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasification process: Solid flux measurements and optimization of the cyclone10.2202/1542-6580.1394 ↗
18. Kunii · 1991
19. A critical validation study on CPFD model in simulating gas–solid bubbling fluidized beds10.1016/j.powtec.2014.05.003 ↗
20. Effect of particle–particle interaction on the bed pressure drop and bubble flow by computational particle-fluid dynamics simulation of bubbling fluidized beds with shroud nozzle10.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.017 ↗
21. Particle drag and pressure drop in accelerated gas–solid flow
22. A new blended acceleration model for the particle contact forces induced by an interstitial fluid in dense particle/fluid flows10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.084 ↗
23. Cold flow model study on a dual circulating fluidized bed (DCFB) system for chemical looping processes10.1002/ceat.200800521 ↗
24. Investigation of gas–solids flow characteristics in a circulating fluidized bed with annular combustion chamber by pressure measurements and CPFD simulation10.1016/j.ces.2015.05.036 ↗
25. BioSNG—Process simulation and comparison with first results from a 1-MW demonstration plant10.1007/s13399-011-0013-3 ↗
26. CFD modeling of riser with Group B particles10.1016/j.powtec.2015.05.020 ↗
27. Scale-up of bubbling fluidized bed reactors—A review10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.004 ↗
28. Influence of operating conditions on the performance of biomass-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis10.1007/s13399-012-0060-4 ↗
29. Cold flow model investigations of the countercurrent flow of a dual circulating fluidized bed gasifier10.1007/s13399-012-0035-5 ↗
30. Cold flow model investigation on a modified riser with enhanced gas–solid contact-locating the regions of operation in a fluidization regime map
31. Effect of particle size distribution on hydrodynamics and solids back-mixing in CFB risers using CPFD simulation10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.025 ↗
32. CPFD simulation of solids residence time and back-mixing in CFB risers10.1016/j.powtec.2014.11.011 ↗
33. Effects of the riser exit geometries on the hydrodynamics and solids back-mixing in CFB risers: 3D simulation using CPFD approach10.1016/j.powtec.2015.06.049 ↗
34. Cold flow model of dual fluidized bed: A review10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.034 ↗
35. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2 ↗
36. An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows10.1006/jcph.2001.6747 ↗
37. Simulation of an internally circulating fluidized bed using a multiphase particle-in-cell method10.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.045 ↗
38. A short note on the drag correlation for spheres10.1016/0032-5910(86)80012-2 ↗
39. Methods for multiphase computational fluid dynamics10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.025 ↗
40. Comparative analysis of CFD models of dense gas–solid systems10.1002/aic.690470510 ↗
41. Particle size distribution in CPFD modeling of gas–solid flows in a CFB riser10.1016/j.partic.2014.06.009 ↗
42. Application of CPFD method in the simulation of a circulating fluidized bed with a loop seal: Part I—Determination of modeling parameters10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.041 ↗
43. Application of CPFD method in the simulation of a circulating fluidized bed with a loop seal Part II—Investigation of solids circulation10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.040 ↗
44. Developing a simulation model for a mixed alcohol synthesis reactor and validation of experimental data in IPSE pro10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.05.024 ↗
45. Fluid bed characterization using Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography (ECVT), compared to CPFD Software's Barracuda10.1016/j.powtec.2013.10.005 ↗
46. Mechanics of fluidization
47. Simulation of heterogeneous structure in a circulating fluidized-bed riser by combining the two-fluid model with the EMMS approach10.1021/ie049773c ↗
48. Simulation of oil shale semi-coke particle cold transportation in a spouted bed using CPFD method10.1016/j.powtec.2016.06.012 ↗