Efficacy of accelerated aging methods to degrade the adhesive interface of dentin cavities bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive systems
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the bond durability produced by etch-and-rinse (E&R) adhesive systems in response to traditional and accelerated aging methods. Tridimensional dentin cavities were prepared on 80 bovine incisors, which were bonded with a 3-step E&R (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus – MP) and a 2-step E&R (Adper Single Bond 2 (SB) adhesive systems, and restored with composite. The samples were stored in water for 24 h, and then subjected to each of the aging methods (n = 10): control group – only 24-h storage (not exposed to additional aging), 6- and 12-month water storage, and 10% NaOCl storage. The push-out bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Aging methods provided statistically similar bond strength for 3-step E&R adhesive system (p > 0.05). 10% NaOCl storage provides statistically similar bond strength values to 6- and 12-month water storage (p > 0.05), which were statistically lower than those provided by 24-h water storage (control group) (p < 0.05). Adhesive failures were more frequent. Aging methods provided different behaviors according to each adhesive system. The accelerated 10% NaOCl storage was effective to decrease bond strength only for 2-step E&R adhesive system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.00310.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003 ↗
2. 10.2174/13816121280330749110.2174/138161212803307491 ↗
3. 10.1021/bm501412410.1021/bm5014124 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.15810.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158 ↗
5. Cunha LG · Quintessence Int · 2008 · 39 · 243
6. 10.1080/0001635060079174410.1080/00016350600791744 ↗
7. 10.3109/00016357.2012.67136410.3109/00016357.2012.671364 ↗
8. 10.1080/01694243.2012.73619010.1080/01694243.2012.736190 ↗
9. 10.2341/12-246-L10.2341/12-246-L ↗
10. 10.3109/00016357.2012.75764910.3109/00016357.2012.757649 ↗
11. 10.1111/eos.2009.117.issue-510.1111/eos.2009.117.issue-5 ↗
12. 10.1177/002203451039179910.1177/0022034510391799 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00083-010.1016/S0109-5641(02)00083-0 ↗
14. 10.1177/0022034500079006060110.1177/00220345000790060601 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.03010.1016/j.dental.2006.06.030 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.02310.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.01610.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016 ↗
20. 10.2341/11-248-L10.2341/11-248-L ↗
21. 10.1111/adj.2011.56.issue-s110.1111/adj.2011.56.issue-s1 ↗