Investigation of lint particle adhesion in offset printing using Weibull statistics
Source abstract
Abstract
Linting is one of the biggest concerns for the newspaper printing industry. In the offset printing process, lint particles from the paper are removed from the paper surface under the force of the tacky ink, adhere to the printing blanket and disrupt the transfer of ink, causing deterioration in image quality and affecting the pressroom productivity. This paper deals with the bond strength of the lint particles released from the paper substrate and printing blanket surface. The strength distribution of lint particles was characterised in order to study the dynamics of linting. The dynamics was modelled using a system with two first-order rate equations. Weibull statistics were used to describe the particle size distribution of the lint collected after the sheet-fed printing trials. In this investigation, the lint samples were collected by washing the lint from the printing blanket, filtering and performing image analysis to measure the particles. In order to analyse the data, the lint particle size was set as an independent variable. The number of small particles removed is as expected much higher than the number of larger particles. When the ink tack is increased and thus also the force working on the lint particles, then the relative increase in large particles is higher than the number of small particles. The removal rate of particles from the printing blanket is independent of particle size indicating that both the adhesion force between particles and blanket and the removal force due to ink tack is proportional to the particle area.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Textile materials and evaluations · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Hoc M. The phenomenon of linting in newsprint printing: Ifra Special Report 1.19, Darmstadt. 2000.
2. Lindem E · Tappi Journal · 1994 · 77 · 185
3. Ionides GN · Paperi ja Puu · 1984 · 66 · 298
4. Moller K, Thomassen B, Weidemmuller J, Menzel P, Walther K, Falter K, Sporing G, Meissner M, Axell O. Factors influencing linting in offset printing of newsprint. Proceedings of the 49th Appita Annual General Conference, Appita, Carlton, Australia; 1995. 115–21.
5. Sudarno A, Batchelor W, Banham P, Gujjari C. Investigation of the effect of press and paper variables on linting during the offset printing of newsprint. Proceedings of Appita Conference, Appita, Melbourne, Australia; 2006. 25–32.10.32964/TJ6.9.25 ↗
6. Mosybe J · Appita Journal · 2008 · 61 · 25
7. Song H · Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal · 2010 · 25 · 49510.3183/NPPRJ-2010-25-04-p495-501 ↗
8. Mangin PJ, Silvy J. Fundamental studies of linting: understanding ink-press-paper interactions non-linearity. TAGA Proceedings. 1997;TAGA:884–905.
9. Bohan MFJ · International Journal for Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow · 2002 · 12 · 49410.1108/09615530210433297 ↗
10. Batchelor W, Sudarno A, Gujjari C, Banham P. Fundamental studies of linting in the offset printing of newsprint. Transactions 14th Fundamental Research Symposium, Fundamental Research Society, Bury (UK); 2009. 1325–50.10.15376/frc.2009.2.1325 ↗
11. Sudarno A. Investigation of the effect of the press and paper variables on linting during the offset printing of newsprint [master’s thesis]. Melbourne (Australia): Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne; 2006.
12. Wiik K. Dynamics of linting. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Appita Conference, Appita, Melbourne, Australia; 2006. 33–5.
13. Batchelor W · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2010 · 24 · 61910.1163/016942409X12619870771420 ↗
14. Korteoja M · Materials Science and Engineering A · 1998 · 248 · 17310.1016/S0921-5093(98)00491-2 ↗
15. Gregersen ØW. On the assessment of effective paper web strength [PhD Thesis].Trondheim (Norway): Institutt for Kjemiteknikk, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Trondheim; 1998.
16. Mangin PJ · Journal of Pulp and Paper Science · 1991 · 17 · 156
17. Amiri R · Pulp and Paper Canada · 2004 · 105 · 23
18. Aspler J. Linting and surface contamination: current status. Proceedings of the Technical Association of the Graphic Arts. 2003;TAGA:52–4.
19. Collins NJ · Appita Journal · 1990 · 43 · 437
20. Heintze HU · Pulp and Paper Canada · 2006 · 107 · 30
21. Lindqvist U · Tappi Journal · 1981 · 64 · 61
22. Mangin PJ. A review of offset linting evaluation. TAGA Proceedings, TAGA, PA. Sewickley.1987:397–442.