journal article·2002-01

Ultrasonic characterization of the interface between a die attach adhesive and a copper leadframe in IC packaging

N. Guo, J. Abdul, B. S. Wong

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The silicon die (chip) and the copper leadframe in IC packaging are bonded by a die attach adhesive, and the quality of the interface is a critical issue in the reliability of IC packaging as well as during the manufacturing process. The common defects such as cracks and delamination can be detected using the C-mode scanning acoustic microscopy. However, a weak interface due to poor adhesion often goes undetected and may become a potential defective area at a later stage. This paper describes the work done to evaluate the quality of the weak interface between a die attach adhesive and a copper leadframe. An interface spring model is used to predict the ultrasonic reflection coefficients. Normal incidence reflection coefficients are measured from a two-layer specimen bonded with a die attach adhesive. The quality of the interface in the samples and its degradation are affected by copper oxidation, and by applying shear stress loading. It is shown that the reflection coefficient depends strongly on both the interface quality and stress loading, indicating that a nondestructive characterization of the interface is possible and the reflection coefficient can be used as a criterion. Keywords: ULTRASONIC EVALUATION OF INTERFACEIC PACKAGINGADHESION STRENGTH
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Suhir, E. and Sullivan, T. M. 1992.Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) Proceedings911–925.10.1109/ECTC.1992.204315 ↗
2. Bischof, C. S. 1995.ECTC Proceedings827–834.10.1109/ECTC.1995.517783 ↗
3. Cui, C. Q., Tay, H. L., Chai, T. C., Gopalakrishan, R. and Lim, T. B. 1998.ECTC Proceedings1162–1166.10.1109/ECTC.1998.678863 ↗
4. Lee, C., Hosler, W., Cerva, H., Criegern, R. V. and Parthasarathi, A. 1998.ECTC Proceedings1154–1161.10.1109/ECTC.1998.678862 ↗
5. Yoshioka, O., Okabe, N., Yamagishi, R., Nagayama, S. and Murakami, G. 1989.ECTC Proceedings464–471.10.1109/ECC.1989.77790 ↗
6. Yang, J. C., Leong, C. W., Goh, J. S. and Yew, C. K. 1996.ECTC Proceedings827–834.
7. Cheung, A. T. 1999.ECTC Proceedings816–822.10.1109/ECTC.1999.776276 ↗
8. Moore, T. M. 1989.Proc. Int. Symp. Testing and Failure Analysis, 61–67. ASM International.
9. Tay, A. A. O. and Lim, T. Y. 1998.ECTC Proceedings371–377.10.1109/ECTC.1998.678821 ↗
10. Chai, T. C., Leslie, A., Lim, T. B. and Lee, C. 1995.ECTC Proceedings463–469.
11. Cho S.-J. · IEEE Trans CHMT, Part B · 1997 · 20 · 167
12. Kang, T.G., Park, I. S., Kim, J.H. and Choi, K.S. 1998.ECTC Proceedings106–111.
13. Tomioka, Y. and Miyake, J. 1999.ECTC Proceedings714–720.10.1109/ECTC.1999.776258 ↗
14. Yi S. · J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. · 1999 · 13 · 78910.1163/156856199X01018 ↗
15. Kim S. · IEEE Trans. CHMT · 1991 · 14 · 809
16. Walberg R. L. · ASME Electronic Packaging Reliability · 1993 · 6 · 55
17. Tattersall H. G. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1973 · 6 · 81910.1088/0022-3727/6/7/305 ↗
18. Drinkwater B. · J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1997 · 101 · 97010.1121/1.418055 ↗
19. Lavrentyev A. I. · J. Acoust. Soc. Am. · 1998 · 103 · 65710.1121/1.423235 ↗
20. Guo N. · J. Nondestructive Eval. · 1995 · 14 · 910.1007/BF00735667 ↗