Functionally graded polymers and ceramic adhesives: dynamic, viscoelastic, and thermal stability analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Functionally graded design transforms polymer composites without altering their properties. These composites change only the surface exposed to severe temperatures, leaving the rest unchanged. This study analyses ceramic additions’ effects on polymer thermal stability and crystallinity. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) examined viscoelastic behaviour and thermogravimetric stability. Alumina, silicon carbide, and hafnium carbide ceramic powders increase thermal stability. DMA examined how ceramic additives affected composite viscoelasticity. The functionally graded design barely affects ceramic adhesive thermal properties. The ceramic adhesive remained stable at 800 °C with only 6% weight loss, while the other two disintegrated before 600 °C.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10716910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107169 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11292510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112925 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.01710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.017 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.03610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.036 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10691810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106918 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10767310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107673 ↗
7. Gupta G, Bnvs K, Sen B, et al. Enhanced creep resistance of GFRP composites through interpenetrating polymer network. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;212:20–22.
8. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10631010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106310 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10642810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106428 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10737910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107379 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.01.02410.1016/j.apm.2019.01.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.13710.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.137 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.11511510.1016/j.jsv.2019.115115 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2018.12.00310.1016/j.ijengsci.2018.12.003 ↗
15. 10.1177/152808371985231210.1177/1528083719852312 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10596210.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105962 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11059410.1016/j.tws.2023.110594 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.052 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.12.03010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.12.030 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.02.00210.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.02.002 ↗
22. 10.51173/jt.v5i2.94910.51173/jt.v5i2.949 ↗
23. 10.1515/epoly-2022-003610.1515/epoly-2022-0036 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12575510.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125755 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.5124410.1002/app.51244 ↗
26. 10.1002/app.5053310.1002/app.50533 ↗
27. 10.1515/zpch-2019-154410.1515/zpch-2019-1544 ↗
28. 10.1007/s12633-020-00498-y10.1007/s12633-020-00498-y ↗
29. Own Allah M, Adam M, Bahaa Eldien SMM. Application of hex methyl enetetramine as a curing agent in the phenolic resin for producing thermal insulating composite material. Univ Khartoum Eng J. 2018;8:1–5.
30. 10.1080/20550340.2023.218768710.1080/20550340.2023.2187687 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.10410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.104 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12633-022-01711-w10.1007/s12633-022-01711-w ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11989810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119898 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10674510.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106745 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1209208310.3390/polym12092083 ↗
36. 10.1002/pc.2695710.1002/pc.26957 ↗
37. ASTM International. West Conshohocken P. Standard test method for compositional analysis by thermogravimetry. ASTM Int. 2000;08:3–4.
38. 10.1007/s10973-024-13015-910.1007/s10973-024-13015-9 ↗
39. Stino SS. Thermal analysis of dental materials : A review. Biomaterials journal. 2023;1:13–23.
40. 10.1007/s11664-019-07681-x10.1007/s11664-019-07681-x ↗
41. 10.32604/jrm.2021.01138510.32604/jrm.2021.011385 ↗
42. ASTM International, West Conshohocken P. Standard test method for glass transition temperature (DMA Tg) of polymer matrix composites by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). ASTM Int. 2000;8:3–4.
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11728910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117289 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10700810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.107008 ↗
45. 10.1177/096739112096844110.1177/0967391120968441 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10098-021-02046-710.1007/s10098-021-02046-7 ↗
47. Mishra A, Shukla M, Shukla MK, et al. Thermal and mechanical characterization of alumina modified multifunctional novolac epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Polym Compos. 2022;30:1–11.
48. 10.1007/s00289-013-1019-810.1007/s00289-013-1019-8 ↗
49. 10.3390/met1104065710.3390/met11040657 ↗
50. 10.1166/jnn.2020.1746010.1166/jnn.2020.17460 ↗
51. 10.1177/0021998321103705910.1177/00219983211037059 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.06110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.061 ↗
53. 10.5028/jatm.2010.0202761010.5028/jatm.2010.02027610 ↗
54. 10.1007/s10853-016-9989-110.1007/s10853-016-9989-1 ↗
55. The Centre for Industrial Rheology. An idealised DMA plot against temperature [Internet]; 2023. Available from: https://www.rheologylab.com/services/dynamic-mechanical-analysis-dma/.
56. Hitachi High-Tech. DMA Deformation modes [Internet]; 2023. Available from: https://www.hitachi-hightech.com/global/en/knowledge/analytical-systems/thermal-analysis/basics/dma.html.
57. 10.1063/1.491915710.1063/1.4919157 ↗
58. 10.3390/solids201000610.3390/solids2010006 ↗
59. 10.1002/app.5014310.1002/app.50143 ↗
60. Kudisonga C, Mucha H, Deckmann H, et al. Dynamic mechanical in-situ analysis of ceramic matrix composites at 1300 °C in oxidizing atmosphere. ICCM Int Conf Compos Mater; 2019: 809–820.
61. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.38710.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.387 ↗
62. 10.1002/pc.2597410.1002/pc.25974 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.19810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.198 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10854-020-04031-010.1007/s10854-020-04031-0 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12654910.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126549 ↗
66. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0105510.1021/acsapm.0c01055 ↗
67. 10.1080/10601325.2020.176183110.1080/10601325.2020.1761831 ↗
68. 10.3390/ceramics504005210.3390/ceramics5040052 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.35910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.359 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.23010.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.230 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12830010.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128300 ↗
72. 10.1515/epoly-2022-007010.1515/epoly-2022-0070 ↗
73. 10.1109/TCPMT.2022.317874110.1109/TCPMT.2022.3178741 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110453 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.12.05110.1016/j.jmst.2022.12.051 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12621910.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126219 ↗
77. Nahar AG, Omer L, Diaz MT, et al. Processing and characterization of high temperature phenolic nanocomposites. Int SAMPE Tech Conf. 2021;2021:330–337.
78. 10.3390/app1006192410.3390/app10061924 ↗
79. 10.3390/jcs612038110.3390/jcs6120381 ↗
80. 10.1002/pc.2573010.1002/pc.25730 ↗
81. 10.1371/journal.pone.029287810.1371/journal.pone.0292878 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12380910.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123809 ↗
83. 10.3390/ma1604134310.3390/ma16041343 ↗
84. 10.1177/1528083721105231710.1177/15280837211052317 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jobab.2020.03.00810.1016/j.jobab.2020.03.008 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11077010.1016/j.matdes.2022.110770 ↗
87. 10.1007/s00170-020-06535-910.1007/s00170-020-06535-9 ↗