journal article·2021-03-19

The number of specimens in a furnace affects the biaxial flexural strength of veneered zirconia specimens after sintering

Marília Pivetta Rippe, Renata Marques de Melo, Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura, Pablo Soares Machado, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza, Luiz Felipe Valandro, Marco Antonio Bottino, Mutlu Özcan

Publisher page

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of the number of specimens in a furnace during the firing of porcelain-zirconia (Y-TZP) discs on their biaxial flexural strength. Eighty bilayer disc-shaped specimens (∅: 15mm; thickness: 1.2 mm, ISO 6872) of zirconia (Vita In-Ceram YZ Cubes/Vita) and porcelain (Vita VM9) ceramics, were prepared and divided into four groups (n = 20) according to the number of specimens in a furnace for each porcelain sintering: G1- one disc/20 sintering cycles.; G2 – two discs/10 sintering cycles.; G5-five discs/4 sintering cycles; and G10 – ten discs/2 sintering cycles. Then, the specimens were submitted to biaxial flexure testing (BFS) (1 mm/min, water). The data (MPa) were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn's post hoc analysis at a 95% level of confidence (α = 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis showed that the number of samples in the furnace affected flexural strength (p < 0.0001). The highest BFS was observed for the G5 (132.3 MPa)A, which was significantly higher than G1 (53.6 MPa)B. No significant difference was observed for the Weibull moduli and characteristic strength among the groups. In terms of flexural strength, approximately five specimens at a time can be placed in a furnace for sintering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Prosthodontics Unit, Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos Dental School, Univ Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São José dos Campos, Brazil

Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil

Prosthodontics Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Brazil

Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Prosthodontics-Biomaterials Unit, Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil

Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.035910.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359 ↗
2. 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.005810.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058 ↗
3. 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.023910.14219/jada.archive.2007.0239 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.00910.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.009 ↗
5. 10.1163/156856111X59358610.1163/156856111X593586 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01221.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01221.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.01210.1016/j.dental.2015.04.012 ↗
8. 10.1155/2019/654851910.1155/2019/6548519 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.00610.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.006 ↗
10. 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.39410.4047/jap.2017.9.5.394 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.01610.1016/j.dental.2019.02.016 ↗
12. Haag P · Swed Dent J · 2011 · 35 · 25
13. 10.4012/dmj.2015-42910.4012/dmj.2015-429 ↗
14. 10.4012/dmj.2013-07010.4012/dmj.2013-070 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.03710.1016/j.dental.2005.04.037 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60045-610.1016/S0022-3913(07)60045-6 ↗
17. DIN ENV 843-5 · Dtsch Inst Fur Norm – DIN · 2007
18. 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.01410.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60282-610.1016/S0022-3913(08)60282-6 ↗
20. 10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.30910.4047/jap.2014.6.4.309 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.09.00310.1016/j.dental.2014.09.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.00510.1016/j.dental.2014.03.005 ↗
23. 10.15171/joddd.2019.03810.15171/joddd.2019.038 ↗
24. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
25. Trindade FZ · J Adhes Dent · 2013 · 15 · 467
26. 10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.34910.4047/jap.2015.7.5.349 ↗
27. O’Brien WJ. · 2002
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.021 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-610.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 ↗
30. Cardoso KV · J Prosthet Dent · 2019 · 30529
31. 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.02110.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.021 ↗
32. Chevalıer J. · Bio-materials · 2006 · 27 · 535
33. 10.1080/01694243.2020.178377310.1080/01694243.2020.1783773 ↗
34. Denry I, Holloway JA. Microstructural and crystallographic surface changes after grinding zirconia-based dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76(2):440-448.10.1002/jbm.b.30382 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01675.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01675.x ↗