Process variable effect on the strength of autoclave-bonded film adhesive joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of five independently-controlled process variables and variable combinations on the shear strength of autoclave-bonded film adhesive joints. Studied variables include the cure temperature, cure pressure and their respective ramp rates, as well as the duration of cure time. A full factorial design of experiment (DoE) at two levels for each variable is conducted with 3 replicas of each test. Test coupons are made of two layers of polycarbonate lexan that are autoclave-bonded using aliphatic polyether film adhesive (Huntsman PE399). Two set of test joints are used for generating test data on shear strength and failure mode. Bonded joints in the first set are tested prior to any environmental cycling, in order to generate baseline data on joint shear strength and failure mode. However, samples from the second set of autoclave-bonded joints were heat-cycled, in an environmental chamber at high relative humidity, prior to testing for shear strength. Test data on shear strength and failure mode is statistically analyzed using ANOVA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Material Properties and Processing · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Fastening and Joining Institute (FAJRI), Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA;
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.10610.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.106 ↗
2. Symietz D. Structural Adhesive Bonding: The Most Innovative Joining Technique for Modern Lightweight Design, Safety and Modular Concepts-Progress Report. SAE Technical Paper. 2005;2005-01-1747.10.4271/2005-01-1747 ↗
3. 10.1016/0261-3069(88)90006-410.1016/0261-3069(88)90006-4 ↗
4. Yorkgitis EM, Marhevka VC, Lamon A. Bonding of Aluminum Structures with Advanced 1K and 2K Adhesives. SAE Technical Paper. 1995;950724.10.4271/950724 ↗
5. Shroeder KJ · Proc Int Conf Body Eng Body Assembly Manuf · 1994 · 10 · 10
6. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00367-210.1016/S0924-0136(99)00367-2 ↗
7. McGrath G · Bulletin · 1991 · 3 · 32
8. Kalpakjian S
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.010 ↗
10. Silva Lf D · 2008
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.02310.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.00810.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.008 ↗
13. 10.1115/IMECE2016-6742710.1115/IMECE2016-67427 ↗
14. Montgomery DC · 2009
15. 10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00013-110.1016/S0143-7496(02)00013-1 ↗
16. 10.1080/01694243.2017.140628910.1080/01694243.2017.1406289 ↗
17. 10.1023/A:101012092158210.1023/A:1010120921582 ↗
18. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69739110.1080/01694243.2012.697391 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.002 ↗
20. 10.1080/01694243.2017.136314110.1080/01694243.2017.1363141 ↗