journal article·2014-02

Asymmetric spatula heads combined with lateral forces provide a mechanism for controlling the adhesive attachment of a range of spider species

Padraig N. Keane, Mads B. Hovgaard, Anika S. Mostaert, Suzanne P. Jarvis

Publisher page

Abstract

Dry adhesion is a common strategy utilized throughout nature, allowing attachment of animals to a large range of surfaces. Crucially, it enables the animal to switch rapidly and safely between attachment and detachment in order to facilitate motion. Here we investigate the magnitude and directionality of the dry adhesion systems of a number of spider species. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to measure the normal adhesion strength of a single setule. Secondly, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to directly observe the interaction of a spider seta with an AFM cantilever tip and then, based on the known stiffness of the cantilever and the deflection distance, to estimate the adhesion force between them. The AFM-measured values for normal adhesion of single spider setules to a surface (9–16 nN) were similar to values predicted by the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) model. In contrast, the force of adhesion, estimated from the SEM images, between the seta and the cantilever reached values as high as 10 μN, much higher than predicted by the JKR theory alone. With spiders, as with geckos, the principle of contact splitting leads to an increase in adhesion force. In addition, it was observed that significantly higher adhesion occurred when the setules were dragged laterally across a spherical surface in the proximal direction (i.e. towards the spider's tarsus). When pushed in the opposite direction, adhesion was greatly reduced. This confirms that the spider dry adhesion system is another example of directional adhesion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Autumn K · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 68110.1038/35015073 ↗
2. Autumn K · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002 · 99 · 1225210.1073/pnas.192252799 ↗
3. Autumn K · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2008 · 366 · 157510.1098/rsta.2007.2173 ↗
4. 10.1163/15685610778232835310.1163/156856107782328353 ↗
5. 10.1163/15685610778232837110.1163/156856107782328371 ↗
6. 10.1163/15685610778232832610.1163/156856107782328326 ↗
7. Niederegger S · Journal of Comparative Physiology a-Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology · 2006 · 192 · 122310.1007/s00359-006-0157-y ↗
8. Kesel AB · Smart Materials & Structures · 2004 · 13 · 51210.1088/0964-1726/13/3/009 ↗
9. Lin AYM · Acta Materialia · 2009 · 57 · 417810.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.015 ↗
10. Autumn K · Integrative and Comparative Biology · 2002 · 42 · 108110.1093/icb/42.6.1081 ↗
11. Federle W · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2006 · 209 · 261110.1242/jeb.02323 ↗
12. Peattie AM · Journal of Comparative Physiology B-Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology · 2009 · 179 · 23110.1007/s00360-008-0310-8 ↗
13. Pesika NS, Zeng HB, Kristiansen K, Zhao BX, Tian Y, Autumn K, Israelachvili J. Gecko adhesion pad: a smart surface? Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter. 2009;21 464132.10.1088/0953-8984/21/46/464132 ↗
14. 10.1163/15685610777997609710.1163/156856107779976097 ↗
15. Peattie AM · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA · 2007 · 104 · 1859510.1073/pnas.0707591104 ↗
16. Autumn K · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2006 · 209 · 26010.1242/jeb.01980 ↗
17. Xing M · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1180910.1021/la100443d ↗
18. Gao HJ · Mechanics of Materials · 2005 · 37 · 275
19. Arzt E · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA · 2003 · 100 · 1060310.1073/pnas.1534701100 ↗
20. Tian Y · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA · 2006 · 103 · 1932010.1073/pnas.0608841103 ↗
21. Autumn K · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2006 · 209 · 356910.1242/jeb.02486 ↗
22. Zhao BX · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 151710.1021/la702126k ↗
23. Zeng HB · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 748610.1021/la900877h ↗
24. Israelachvili J · 1991
25. Leckband D · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · 2001 · 34 · 10510.1017/S0033583501003687 ↗
26. Huber G · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA · 2005 · 102 · 1629310.1073/pnas.0506328102 ↗
27. Puthoff JB · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2010 · 213 · 369910.1242/jeb.047654 ↗
28. Johnson KL · Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series a-Mathematical and Physical Sciences · 1971 · 324 · 30110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
29. Boesel LF · Advanced Materials · 2010 · 22 · 212510.1002/adma.200903200 ↗
30. Coddington JA · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · 1991 · 22 · 56510.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.003025 ↗
31. Roberts M. Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe collins field guide. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1995.
32. Vollrath F · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · 2007 · 38 · 81910.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110221 ↗
33. Moon MJ · Animal Cells and Systems · 2009 · 13 · 16110.1080/19768354.2009.9647208 ↗
34. Rizzo NW · Journal of the Royal Society Interface · 2006 · 3 · 44110.1098/rsif.2005.0097 ↗
35. Keane PN. Temporary adhesive systems in invertebrates: comparing and contrasting morphological, nanomechanical, and biomolecular characteristics. [dissertation]: University College Dublin; 2012.
36. Schultz S · 1998
37. Cambridge FOP · Zoology · 1897 · 2 · 1
38. Ausserer A · Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien · 1875 · 25 · 125
39. Smith AM · Mygalomorph · 1996 · 1 · 21
40. Griswold CE, Ramirez MJ, Coddington JA, Platnick NI. Atlas of phylogenetic data for entelegyne spiders (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Entelegynae) with comments on their phylogeny. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences. 2005;56(Suppl. 2):1–317, 319–324.
41. Clerck C. Svenska spindlar, uti sina hufvud-slågter indelte samt under några och sextio särskildte arter beskrefne och med illuminerade figurer uplyste. Stockholmiae. 1757.10.5962/bhl.title.119890 ↗
42. Kuo J. Electron microscopy: methods and protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2007.10.1007/978-1-59745-294-6 ↗
43. Hutter JL · Review of Scientific Instruments · 1993 · 64 · 186810.1063/1.1143970 ↗
44. Wavemetrics Inc. IGOR Pro 6.10A. Lake Oswego, OR; 1988–2009.
45. SPSS Inc. TwoStep cluster analysis. Technical report. Chicago, IL; 2004.
46. Abramoff · Biophotonics International · 2004 · 11 · 36
47. Huber G · Biology Letters · 2005 · 1 · 210.1098/rsbl.2004.0254 ↗
48. Kesel AB · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2003 · 206 · 273310.1242/jeb.00478 ↗
49. Fabritius H, Sachs C, Raabe D, Nikolov S, Friak M, Neugebauer J. Chitin: formation and diagenesis. In: Gupta NS, editor. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. p. 35–60.10.1007/978-90-481-9684-5_2 ↗
50. Varenberg M · Soft Matter · 2010 · 6 · 326910.1039/c003207g ↗
51. Gao HJ · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA · 2004 · 101 · 785110.1073/pnas.0400757101 ↗