Adsorption behavior of β-lactoglobulin onto polyethersulfone membrane surface
Source abstract
Abstract
The adsorption of whey protein onto polyethersulfone (PES) membrane was investigated by static adsorption experiments to understand fouling mechanism and optimize the process condition to minimize the membrane fouling. Adsorption isotherm was applied to calculate the isotherm parameters such as adsorption capacity (KF) and surface heterogeneity (1/n). The KF values increased about 3.7 times at pH 3.0, 1.5 times at pH 5.2, and 2.3 times at pH 9.0 compared to that at pH 7.0. The hydrophobic interaction by dissociation of dimer structure of β-lactoglobulin to monomer structure at acidic and alkaline conditions showed the greatly increasing of the amount of protein adsorption by the protein and membrane interaction which might form the strong and rigid protein layer on the polymeric membrane surface. The addition of salt reduced the protein adsorption on PES membrane because of the interactions between charged protein molecules and salt ions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University, Daegu 704-701, Korea
College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Tunick MH · 2009 · 1
2. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75232-X10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75232-X ↗
3. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74041-710.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74041-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.00110.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.05.00610.1016/j.idairyj.2014.05.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00493-910.1016/S0011-9164(02)00493-9 ↗
7. 10.1080/1040869049091178310.1080/10408690490911783 ↗
8. 10.1163/156856104241125910.1163/1568561042411259 ↗
9. 10.1016/0376-7388(92)80151-910.1016/0376-7388(92)80151-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00286-310.1016/0376-7388(95)00286-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.04410.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.044 ↗
12. 10.1016/0011-9164(90)85007-W10.1016/0011-9164(90)85007-W ↗
13. 10.1016/0376-7388(94)87031-410.1016/0376-7388(94)87031-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00108-O10.1016/0376-7388(95)00108-O ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.06.005 ↗
16. 10.1163/156856105435250410.1163/1568561054352504 ↗
17. 10.1006/jcis.1997.501710.1006/jcis.1997.5017 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00315-X10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00315-X ↗
19. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-028210.1002/(ISSN)1097-0282 ↗
20. 10.1038/2141101a010.1038/2141101a0 ↗
21. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook. Lancaster (PA): Technomic Publishing CO, Inc.; 1998. p. 245–266.10.1201/9781482278743 ↗
22. 10.1038/203517a010.1038/203517a0 ↗
23. 10.1111/jfds.2007.72.issue-410.1111/jfds.2007.72.issue-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jala.2009.01.00310.1016/j.jala.2009.01.003 ↗