journal article·1998-01

The single fiber pull-out test analysis: influence of a compliant coating on the stresses at bonded interfaces

M.Y. Quek

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The mechanical properties at the fiber/matrix interface play a significant role in controlling the fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composites. By coating the fiber with sizing and coupling agents, these interfacial properties can be modified. The aim of the present analysis was to examine the effects of the coating thickness and modulus on the stresses at the bonded interfaces between the fiber, coating, and matrix. Using the fiber pull-out test as the analytical model, the stresses are first obtained by minimizing the total complementary energy in the coated fiber/matrix composite. The analytical results show that the interfacial shear stress between the fiber and the coating is higher than that between the matrix and the coating. Also, a thin and compliant coating reduces substantially the peak interfacial shear stress but not the interfacial radial stress due to Poisson's effect on the fiber. Furthermore, the shear stress transfer from the fiber to the matrix across the coating layer is found to be more uniform. The implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Fiber pull-outfiber-reinforced compositescoatinginterfacestress analysiscomplementary energy
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Hsueh C. H. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1990 · 123 · 110.1016/0921-5093(90)90203-F ↗
2. Yue C. Y. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1994 · 29 · 248710.1007/BF00363444 ↗
3. Broutman J. · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 1974 · 14 · 58110.1002/pen.760140808 ↗
4. Hsueh C. H. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1989 · 117 · 11510.1016/0921-5093(89)90092-0 ↗
5. Tsai C. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1990 · 126 · 29510.1016/0921-5093(90)90136-Q ↗
6. Jayaraman K. · Composite Mater. · 1992 · 26 · 77010.1177/002199839202600601 ↗
7. Jayaraman K. · Composites Sci. Technol. · 1993 · 47 · 11910.1016/0266-3538(93)90041-E ↗
8. Pagano, N. J. 1992.Local Mechanics Concepts for Composite Materials Systems, IUTAM Symposium, Blacksburg, VA, Edited by: Reddy, J. N. and Reifsnider, K. L. 2–26. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Ho H. · Composites Eng. · 1995 · 5 · 123110.1016/0961-9526(95)00065-U ↗
10. Ho H. · Composites Eng. · 1995 · 5 · 124510.1016/0961-9526(95)00055-R ↗
11. Ho H. · Composites Part A · 1996 · 27 · 96110.1016/1359-835X(96)84802-0 ↗
12. Jao S. H. · Composite Mater. · 1992 · 26 · 2631
13. Hsueh C. H. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1993 · 165 · 18910.1016/0921-5093(93)90754-3 ↗
14. Kim J. K. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1994 · 29 · 55410.1007/BF01162521 ↗
15. Whitney, J. M. and Drzal, L. T. 1987.Toughened Composites, ASTM STP 937 Edited by: Johnston, N. J. 179–196. American Society for Testing and Materials.
16. Quek M. Y. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1994 · 189 · 10510.1016/0921-5093(94)90406-5 ↗
17. Fenner, R. T. 1986.Engineering Elasticity, 379Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
18. Quek M. Y. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1997 · 32 · 545710.1023/A:1018647718400 ↗
19. Yue C. Y. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1991 · 26 · 87010.1007/BF00576762 ↗
20. Marotzke C. · Composites Sci. Technol. · 1994 · 50 · 39310.1016/0266-3538(94)90027-2 ↗