The effect of repair protocols on shear bond strength to zirconia and veneering porcelain
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a new repairing material including zirconia primer to zirconia and veneering porcelain after various surface treatments. A total of 60 specimens (30 zirconia-Zr and 30 feldspathic porcelain-Feld) were prepared and divided into 6 groups (n = 10). Two surface preparations (air abrasion-AA and Erbium Yag (Er-YAG) Laser-Las) were applied to the specimens. Zr and Feld specimens treated with a grinding bur according to manufacturer advice, were used as control (C). Repair material (Cimara Zircon, VOCO, Germany) was applied to the specimens 2 mm in height. The SBS was measured in a universal testing machine at 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The SBS data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD multiple comparison tests (α = 0.05). Significant effects of the material type (p = 0.005) and the surface treatment strategy (p = 0.000) were found. Interaction terms were also significant (p = 0.000). While the Zr-C (68,4 MPa) showed the highest SBS (p < 0.05), Zr-Las (16,4 MPa) had the lowest SBS (p < 0.05). The highest SBS value was obtained when both zirconia and veneering porcelain were treated with a grinding bur without any additional surface treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
,
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-110.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-1 ↗
2. 10.1111/jor.2012.39.issue-710.1111/jor.2012.39.issue-7 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00767.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00767.x ↗
4. 10.1007/s00784-015-1455-y10.1007/s00784-015-1455-y ↗
5. 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-810.1007/s00784-010-0432-8 ↗
6. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2010;23:493–502.
7. 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.001110.14219/jada.archive.2013.0011 ↗
8. Saker S, Ibrahim F, Ozcan M. Effect of different surface treatments on adhesion of In-Ceram Zirconia to enamel and dentin substrates. J. Adhes. Dent. 2013;15:369–376.
9. 10.1007/s00784-012-0863-510.1007/s00784-012-0863-5 ↗
10. 10.2341/11-482-L10.2341/11-482-L ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.03510.1016/j.dental.2005.11.035 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.01210.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.012 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60033-910.1016/S0022-3913(10)60033-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00452-910.1016/S0022-3913(03)00452-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.04310.1016/j.dental.2006.06.043 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.00810.1016/j.dental.2009.08.008 ↗
17. 10.1089/pho.2009.269710.1089/pho.2009.2697 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00047-110.1016/S0109-5641(01)00047-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.05210.1016/j.dental.2006.06.052 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.01010.1016/j.dental.2008.02.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.00410.1016/j.dental.2010.10.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.00710.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.007 ↗
23. 10.4103/1305-7456.12624010.4103/1305-7456.126240 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.02210.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022 ↗
25. 10.1163/15685610778047491110.1163/156856107780474911 ↗
26. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Pereira SM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex. J. Adhes. Dent. 2013;15:207–210.
27. 10.1016/S0889-5406(02)56911-010.1016/S0889-5406(02)56911-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.01310.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.013 ↗
29. 10.2334/josnusd.54.3910.2334/josnusd.54.39 ↗
30. Miragaya L, Maia LC, Sabrosa CE, et al. Evaluation of self-adhesive resin cement bond strength to yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic (Y-TZP) using four surface treatments. J. Adhes. Dent. 2011;13:473–480.
31. 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-810.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-8 ↗
32. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-463610.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.00410.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.004 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10103-011-0965-310.1007/s10103-011-0965-3 ↗
35. 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-910110.1002/(ISSN)1096-9101 ↗
36. 10.1089/pho.2007.201810.1089/pho.2007.2018 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10103-011-0883-410.1007/s10103-011-0883-4 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.01610.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016 ↗
39. 10.1177/1045441197008003050110.1177/10454411970080030501 ↗
40. 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-310.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-610.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-6 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.04010.1016/j.dental.2005.11.040 ↗