Investigation on surface treatments of CFRP and aluminum to improve fracture toughness of adhesively-bonded CFRP–aluminum joints
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the role of surface treatments of CFRP (graphite/epoxy composite) and aluminum (7075-T6) on the adhesively-bonded CFRP-aluminum joints has been investigated. The CFRP was surface-treated by Ar+ ion irradiation in an oxygen environment and the aluminum was surface-treated using a DC plasma. Ar+ ion irradiation treatment was carried out at Ar+ ion dose of 1016 ions/cm2. Plasma treatment was carried out at a volume ratio of acetylene gas to nitrogen gas of 5:5 and the treatment time was 30 s. The effect of surface treatments on the fracture behavior CFRP-aluminum joints was determined from fracture tests using three different CLS (cracked lap shear) specimens: (1) untreated CFRP/untreated aluminum, (2) ion-irradiated CFRP/untreated aluminum and (3) untreated CFRP/plasma-treated aluminum. Fracture behaviors (fracture load, fracture toughness, fracture surfaces) of these three different specimens were compared. The results showed that both fracture load and fracture toughness of CFRP-aluminum joints were in the following order: ion-irradiated CFRP/untreated aluminum specimen > untreated CFRP/plasmatreated aluminum specimen > untreated CFRP/untreated aluminum specimen. SEM examination of fracture surfaces showed that fracture occurred as an interfacial failure for untreated specimens. On the other hand, a cohesive failure in the adhesive was the primary fracture mode for specimens surface-treated by ion irradiation or plasma.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Baker A. A. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1992 · 12 · 7310.1016/0143-7496(92)90026-R ↗
2. Chester R. J. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1999 · 19 · 110.1016/S0143-7496(98)00014-1 ↗
3. Molitor P. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 2002 · 22 · 10110.1016/S0143-7496(01)00041-0 ↗
4. Davis G. D. · Surf. Interface Anal. · 1997 · 25 · 36610.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199705)25:5<366::AID-SIA245>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
5. Wade G. A. · Interface Sci. · 2000 · 8 · 36310.1023/A:1008779728985 ↗
6. Koh S. K. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1997 · 64 · 191310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970606)64:10<1913::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
7. Galantucci L. M. · Composites · 1996 · 27 · 104110.1016/1359-835X(96)88890-7 ↗
8. Man H. C. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1998 · 18 · 15110.1016/S0143-7496(97)00044-4 ↗
9. 10.1163/15685610232025291210.1163/156856102320252912 ↗
10. Rhee K. Y. · Polym. Composite · 2002 · 23 · 115110.1002/pc.10508 ↗
11. O'Brien T. K. · J. Composite Technol. Res. · 1993 · 15 · 26910.1520/CTR10379J ↗
12. Rhee K. Y. · J. Composite Mater. · 1993 · 27 · 96210.1177/002199839302701001 ↗
13. Dattaguru B. · Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mater. · 1984 · 106 · 5910.1115/1.3225677 ↗
14. Chou, I., Kimpara, I., Kageyama, K. and Ohsawa, I. 1995.Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture (Fifth Volume), ASTM STP 1230 Edited by: Martin, R. H. 132–151. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials.10.1520/STP14012S ↗
15. Cho J. S. · Surf. Coatmg. Technol. · 2000 · 128 · 6610.1016/S0257-8972(00)00658-7 ↗
16. Nakamura Y. · Thin Solid Films · 1996 · 290 · 36710.1016/S0040-6090(96)09017-7 ↗
17. Rhee K. Y. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 357 · 27010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00207-7 ↗
18. Park S. C. · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 1998 · 38 · 118510.1002/pen.10286 ↗