Inspection of composite and metal adhesive bonds with an electrochemical sensor
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An in-situ sensor, based on Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), has been used to monitor the health of adhesive bonds constructed from various combinations of aluminum, graphite/epoxy, glass/epoxy, glass/polyester, and glass/vinylester composites and exposed to high humidity and temperature conditions. Modeling of the EIS data as an electric circuit demonstrated that several circuit parameters of the impedance spectra were sensitive to bond performance, as determined by wedge tests and lap shear tests. Moisture absorption by the adhesive and composite was calculated from the circuit capacitance, which was also a function of bonded area and bondline thickness (bondline + composite thickness for glass composites). Material differences, including saturation level of moisture, rate of absorption, and bondline stability, were readily seen among the various materials sets. The sensor electrodes are attached to opposite sides of a bond after fabrication, i.e. they are not embedded. Thus, they are suitable for monitoring existing bonded structures. They have the potential to identify bondlines that are in the early stages of degradation, prior to significant loss of bond strength. As an input to a condition-based maintenance system, they would identify weakening bondlines and allow preventative action to be scheduled and performed. Keywords: INSPECTIONMOISTUREDEGRADATIONSENSORCOMPOSITEADHESIVE BONDCONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCEELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Davis, G. D. and Shaffer, D. K. 1994.Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Edited by: Pizzi, A. and Mittal, K. L. 113New York: Marcel Dekker.
2. Kinloch A. J. · 198710.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
3. Davis, G. D., Dacres, C. M. and Krebs, L. A. 2000. NACE Corrosion 2000. 2000, Orlando, FL. Paper No. 275
4. Davis G. D. · Mater. Performance · 2000 · 39 · 46
5. Krebs, L. A., Davis, G. D. and Dacres, C. M. 2001. NACE Corrosion 2001. 2001, Houston, TX. Paper No. 1430
6. Davis G. D. · J. Coatings Technol.
7. Scully J. R. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1989 · 136 · 97910.1149/1.2096897 ↗
8. Kendig M. · Corrosion Sci. · 1983 · 23
9. Scully, J. R. 1990.Corrosion Testing and Evaluation: Silver Anniversary Volume, ASTM STP1000, Edited by: Baboian, R. and Dean, S. W. 351Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.10.1520/STP1000-EB ↗
10. Murray, J. N. and Hack, H. P. 1990. NACE Corrosion 90. 1990, Las Vegas, NV. Paper No. 140
11. Mansfeld F. · Corrosion · 1982 · 38 · 47810.5006/1.3577363 ↗
12. Simpson T. C. · Prog. Org. Coatings · 1992 · 20 · 19910.1016/0033-0655(92)80005-H ↗
13. Murray J. N. · Prog. Org. Coatings · 1997 · 31 · 37510.1016/S0300-9440(97)00099-4 ↗
14. Davis, G. D., Whisnant, P. L. and Wolff, J. P. Jr. 1996.Proc. 41st Inter. SAMPE Symp.544
15. Davis G. D. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives
16. Davis G. D. · J. Adhesion · 2000 · 72 · 33510.1080/00218460008029289 ↗
17. Davis, G. D., Krebs, L. A. and Dacres, C. M. 2001.Proc. 46th Inter. SAMPE Symp.20
18. Affrossman S. · Proc. Instn. Mechn. Engrs. · 2000 · 214 · 8710.1243/0957650001537886 ↗
19. Joshi S. B. · J. Adhesion · 1997 · 62 · 28110.1080/00218469708014573 ↗
20. Joshi S. B. · J. Adhesion · 1997 · 62 · 31710.1080/00218469708014574 ↗
21. Boinard P. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 35 · 133110.1023/A:1004717704215 ↗