journal article·2018-04-03

Reliable thin chip peeling from adhesive tape with inverted needle ejecting and spring buffering

Jinhua Hong, Jiankui Chen, Zhoulong Xu, Zhouping Yin

Publisher page

Abstract

Nondestructively and efficiently peeling thin chip from the adhesive tape is still one of the crucial techniques in IC packaging technology. In order to improve the process efficiency, a novel approach with the inverted ejecting mechanism and spring buffer head is proposed, where, however, the ejecting and spring forces applied at the chip for generating the interfacial crack are also more likely to resulting in the damage of chip. In view of this, an effective theoretical and finite element models are established considering the tape–adhesive–chip structure with ejecting and spring forces, and in the frame of fracture mechanics, the energy release rate is calculated and introduced to reveal effects of the spring buffer on the interfacial crack growth and chip breaking stresses. It is showed that the spring buffer is able to reduce the stress concentration on chip. Furthermore, according to the competing fracture behavior between the interfacial delamination and the chip cracking, the process window of thin chip peeling is suggested for selecting an appropriate spring coefficient and ejecting needle force.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) · National Science and Technology Support Program

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/539365a10.1038/539365a ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1231410.1038/nature12314 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.sse.2010.04.04210.1016/j.sse.2010.04.042 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7276-710.1007/978-1-4419-7276-7 ↗
5. Greig W · 2007
6. 10.1080/01694243.2015.102686910.1080/01694243.2015.1026869 ↗
7. 10.1109/TCPMT.2016.261223810.1109/TCPMT.2016.2612238 ↗
8. 10.1109/TEPM.2005.84739610.1109/TEPM.2005.847396 ↗
9. 10.1163/15685610677902446310.1163/156856106779024463 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.364297510.1063/1.3642975 ↗
11. 10.1109/TCPMT.2012.219785910.1109/TCPMT.2012.2197859 ↗
12. 10.1109/TCPMT.2014.229803610.1109/TCPMT.2014.2298036 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.403104710.1115/1.4031047 ↗
14. 10.1109/TCPMT.2015.247683810.1109/TCPMT.2015.2476838 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.018 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.03010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.030 ↗
19. 10.1163/156856109X43300910.1163/156856109X433009 ↗
20. 10.1016/0013-7944(92)90198-N10.1016/0013-7944(92)90198-N ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.007 ↗
23. 10.1080/01694243.2012.73590210.1080/01694243.2012.735902 ↗