Correlation between cell surface physicochemical properties of bacterial strains and their chromium removal potential
Source abstract
Abstract
Physicochemical characterization of microbes has gained recently a great interest by scientific community. It is proved of extreme importance in several fields of science and technology applications such as bioremediation. In this work, we investigated the establishment of a possible correlation between chromium removal capacity of seven bacterial strains isolated from contaminated sites with industrial wastes including tanning processing and their cell surface physicochemical properties. Thus, hydrophobicity and donor/acceptor electrons character were obtained using contact angle measurements. Statistical analysis showed a high significant positive correlation between hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) removal by the strains and their acceptor electron character γ+(r = 0.90). While significant negative correlation between the Cr(VI) removal potential and the ΔGiwi value (r = −0.844) and also with their donor electron character γ− (r = −0.746) were observed. These results may contribute to determine a selectrion criteria of bacteria that can be operated in bioremediation applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chromium effects and bioremediation · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Analytical chemistry methods development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire de Biotechnologie Microbienne, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fès, Morocco
Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, CNRS – Université de Toulouse (INPT), Toulouse, France
Centre Universitaire Régional d’Interface, Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fès, Morocco
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.10410.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.104 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.02510.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.025 ↗
3. 10.1007/s13762-011-0009-310.1007/s13762-011-0009-3 ↗
4. 10.1080/09593330.2011.57292210.1080/09593330.2011.572922 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.09510.1016/j.cej.2015.03.095 ↗
6. Tahri Joutey N · Morocco · 2011 · 6 · 37
7. 10.1080/01490451.2012.70522810.1080/01490451.2012.705228 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0332614910.1007/BF03326149 ↗
9. Gӧksungur Y · Turkish J Biol · 2003 · 27 · 23
10. Bahafid W · J Environ Sci Eng · 2011 · 5 · 98010.17265/1934-8932/2011.08.005 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00253010075810.1007/s002530100758 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.03110.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.031 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00037-X10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00037-X ↗
14. 10.1134/S002626171101015210.1134/S0026261711010152 ↗
15. 10.1021/cr00088a00610.1021/cr00088a006 ↗
16. Van Oss CJ · 1996
17. 10.1039/C6EN00060F10.1039/C6EN00060F ↗
18. 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00138-510.1016/S0043-1354(01)00138-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.02110.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.08310.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.083 ↗
21. 10.1590/S1517-8382200800010000310.1590/S1517-83822008000100003 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-710.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.05510.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.055 ↗
24. 10.1021/bp00033a00110.1021/bp00033a001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.00810.1016/j.watres.2009.04.008 ↗
26. Płaza GA · Polish J Microbiol · 2005 · 54 · 161
27. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.10.00410.1016/j.ibiod.2008.10.004 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11274-006-9282-610.1007/s11274-006-9282-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.03910.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.039 ↗
30. 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3262-3268.200010.1128/AEM.66.8.3262-3268.2000 ↗