journal article·2017-12-17Open access

Correlation between cell surface physicochemical properties of bacterial strains and their chromium removal potential

Meryem Asri, Alae Elabed, Nabil Tirry, Aziza Kouchou, Saad Ibnsouda Koraichi, Naïma El Ghachtouli, Soumya Elabed

Publisher page

Abstract

Physicochemical characterization of microbes has gained recently a great interest by scientific community. It is proved of extreme importance in several fields of science and technology applications such as bioremediation. In this work, we investigated the establishment of a possible correlation between chromium removal capacity of seven bacterial strains isolated from contaminated sites with industrial wastes including tanning processing and their cell surface physicochemical properties. Thus, hydrophobicity and donor/acceptor electrons character were obtained using contact angle measurements. Statistical analysis showed a high significant positive correlation between hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) removal by the strains and their acceptor electron character γ+(r = 0.90). While significant negative correlation between the Cr(VI) removal potential and the ΔGiwi value (r = −0.844) and also with their donor electron character γ− (r = −0.746) were observed. These results may contribute to determine a selectrion criteria of bacteria that can be operated in bioremediation applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chromium effects and bioremediation · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Analytical chemistry methods development

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratoire de Biotechnologie Microbienne, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fès, Morocco

Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, CNRS – Université de Toulouse (INPT), Toulouse, France

Centre Universitaire Régional d’Interface, Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fès, Morocco

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.10410.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.104 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.02510.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.025 ↗
3. 10.1007/s13762-011-0009-310.1007/s13762-011-0009-3 ↗
4. 10.1080/09593330.2011.57292210.1080/09593330.2011.572922 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.09510.1016/j.cej.2015.03.095 ↗
6. Tahri Joutey N · Morocco · 2011 · 6 · 37
7. 10.1080/01490451.2012.70522810.1080/01490451.2012.705228 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0332614910.1007/BF03326149 ↗
9. Gӧksungur Y · Turkish J Biol · 2003 · 27 · 23
10. Bahafid W · J Environ Sci Eng · 2011 · 5 · 98010.17265/1934-8932/2011.08.005 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00253010075810.1007/s002530100758 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.03110.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.031 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00037-X10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00037-X ↗
14. 10.1134/S002626171101015210.1134/S0026261711010152 ↗
15. 10.1021/cr00088a00610.1021/cr00088a006 ↗
16. Van Oss CJ · 1996
17. 10.1039/C6EN00060F10.1039/C6EN00060F ↗
18. 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00138-510.1016/S0043-1354(01)00138-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.02110.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.08310.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.083 ↗
21. 10.1590/S1517-8382200800010000310.1590/S1517-83822008000100003 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-710.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.05510.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.055 ↗
24. 10.1021/bp00033a00110.1021/bp00033a001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.00810.1016/j.watres.2009.04.008 ↗
26. Płaza GA · Polish J Microbiol · 2005 · 54 · 161
27. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.10.00410.1016/j.ibiod.2008.10.004 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11274-006-9282-610.1007/s11274-006-9282-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.03910.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.039 ↗
30. 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3262-3268.200010.1128/AEM.66.8.3262-3268.2000 ↗