journal article·2016-11-16

Nanoleakage within adhesive-dentin interfaces made with simplified ethanol-wet bonding

Muhammet Kerim Ayar, Tahsin Yildirim, Cemal Yesilyurt

Publisher page

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique and conventional water-wet bonding technique on short term nanoleakage within hybrid layers made with two different etch-and-rinse adhesives (Single Bond 2 and Prime & Bond NT). Materials and methods: Flat dentin surfaces from bovine incisors were prepared and finished with wet 600-grit abrasive papers, then divided into groups to be bonded with one of the adhesives. After etching and rinsing, dentin surfaces were either moistened with water (water-wet bonding technique) or moistened with absolute ethanol for 1 min (ethanol-wet bonding technique). Then, adhesives were applied, and composite buildups were done. Bonded teeth samples were sectioned into resin–dentin samples by means of a low speed diamond saw under water cooling. Specimens were immersed into a 50% (w/v) solution of silver ammoniacal nitrate for 18 h and exposed to photodeveloping solution for 6 h. The amount of silver nitrate uptake within the adhesive layer, or hybrid layer, was measured with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in different regions (n = 30). Results: Simplified ethanol-wet bonding significantly reduced nanoleakage within resin–dentin interfaces made with Single Bond 2 and Prime & Bond NT, but improvement at the nanoleakage of Single Bond 2 was only significant. Conclusion: Simplified ethanol-wet bonding may improve quality of hybrid layers made with commercially available simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. But benefits of ethanol-wet bonding may depend on product.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.01610.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016 ↗
2. 10.2341/14-095-BL10.2341/14-095-BL ↗
3. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.00910.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009 ↗
4. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-463610.1002/(ISSN)1097-4636 ↗
5. 10.1177/15440591060850010210.1177/154405910608500102 ↗
6. 10.1177/0022034599078004110110.1177/00220345990780041101 ↗
7. 10.1177/0022034500079006060110.1177/00220345000790060601 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X ↗
9. 10.1177/15440591040830030610.1177/154405910408300306 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.00910.1016/j.dental.2009.12.009 ↗
11. Pashley DH · Am. J. Dent · 2007 · 20 · 7
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.00610.1016/j.dental.2009.03.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.00510.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.005 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00830.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00830.x ↗
15. 10.1177/002203450832891010.1177/0022034508328910 ↗
16. 10.1177/15440591020810070810.1177/154405910208100708 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00085-810.1016/S0109-5641(99)00085-8 ↗
18. Sano H · Oper. Dent · 1994 · 20 · 18
19. 10.1177/0022034593072010120110.1177/00220345930720101201 ↗
20. 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80048-410.1016/0109-5641(95)80048-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.01010.1016/j.dental.2015.05.010 ↗
22. Li F · J. Adhes. Dent · 2012 · 14 · 113
23. 10.4012/dmj.2014-33510.4012/dmj.2014-335 ↗