journal article·2019-11-18

Mode-II fracture properties of CFRP/steel composite structure reinforced by short aramid fibers

Binhua Wang, Sisi Kang, Gang Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

To obtain a good bonding strength of steel/CFRP adhesive joint, the steel surface was machined by grooving process. Short aramid fibers were mixed into the adhesive layer to achieve the further adhesion strength. In the pressing process of steel/CFRP specimen preparation, short aramid fibers with the diameter of several micrometers could be embedded in the grooved gap and the rough surface of CFRP. The higher strength aramid fibers had been not only improved interfacial strength of steel/epoxy and CFRP/epoxy, but also reinforced the adhesive layer due to the bridging activities of aramid fibers. In this study, Mode II fracture strength of grooved-steel/CFRP adhesive joints was investigated by end-notch bending test. The ultimate load and fracture energy of specimens have been improved by 15.7 and 6.8%, in comparison to specimens with smooth steel surface, respectively. The reinforcing mechanisms of CFRP/steel bonding joint as a result of short aramid fibers were discussed according to the failure modes of specimens, and scanning electron microscopy observation and experimental results were carried out.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment, MOE, Chang’an University, Xi’an, PR China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Fessel G · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2007 · 27 · 57410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.016 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.09710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.097 ↗
4. Zhang F · Compos Struct · 2018 · 15 · 92110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.034 ↗
5. Sun Z · Compos Struct · 2015 · 77 · 38
6. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.10.03210.1016/j.apm.2018.10.032 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.005 ↗
8. Santos DG · Compos Part B · 2019 · 165 · 38610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.096 ↗
9. SomKwon D · Compos Struct · 2019 · 207 · 24010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.044 ↗
10. Pethrick RA · Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L · 2015 · 229 · 349
11. Yahya NA · Proc IMechE · 2016 · 230 · 8810.1177/1464420714547223 ↗
12. 10.1080/0021846860807323810.1080/00218468608073238 ↗
13. 10.1080/01694243.2019.163253710.1080/01694243.2019.1632537 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.06.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.06.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.06.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.06.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.04.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.004 ↗
18. Yun IH · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 109 · 1877
19. Sharifi Golru S · Appl Surf Sci · 2015 · 1050 · 36010.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.148 ↗
20. Lucas FM · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2010 · 30 · 73510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.07.005 ↗
21. Yi DB · Compos Struct · 2018 · 188 · 37410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.047 ↗
22. Zhang SS · Constr Build Mater · 2017 · 155 · 10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.064 ↗
23. Islam MS · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2016 · 68 · 30510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.04.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.04.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.04.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.002 ↗
27. Teng JG · J Constr Steel Res · 2012 · 78 · 13110.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.011 ↗
28. ASTM DM · 2006
29. Mollón V · Compos Struct · 2012 · 94 · 118710.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.025 ↗
30. Zhuhuadong · J Compos Mater · 2001 · 18 · 85
31. Lee SH · J Compos Mater · 2002 · 36 · 215310.1177/0021998302036018981 ↗