journal article·2014-07-18Open access

Strap repairs using embedded patches: numerical analysis and experimental results

A.M.G. Pinto, R.D.S.G. Campilho, I.R. Mendes, A.P.M. Baptista

Abstract

Adhesively bonded repairs offer an attractive option for repair of aluminium structures, compared to more traditional methods such as fastening or welding. The single-strap (SS) and double-strap (DS) repairs are very straightforward to execute but stresses in the adhesive layer peak at the overlap ends. The DS repair requires both sides of the damaged structures to be reachable for repair, which is often not possible. In strap repairs, with the patches bonded at the outer surfaces, some limitations emerge such as the weight, aerodynamics and aesthetics. To minimize these effects, SS and DS repairs with embedded patches were evaluated in this work, such that the patches are flush with the adherends. For this purpose, in this work standard SS and DS repairs, and also with the patches embedded in the adherends, were tested under tension to allow the optimization of some repair variables such as the overlap length (LO) and type of adhesive, thus allowing the maximization of the repair strength. The effect of embedding the patch/patches on the fracture modes and failure loads was compared with finite elements (FE) analysis. The FE analysis was performed in ABAQUS® and cohesive zone modelling was used for the simulation of damage onset and growth in the adhesive layer. The comparison with the test data revealed an accurate prediction for all kinds of joints and provided some principles regarding this technique.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Luo Q · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 2007 · 44 · 234910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.07.009 ↗
2. Campilho RDSG · Composites Science and Technology · 2005 · 65 · 194810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.007 ↗
3. Osnes H · Composites Part B · 2003 · 34 · 41710.1016/S1359-8368(03)00023-4 ↗
4. 10.1080/0021846080250527510.1080/00218460802505275 ↗
5. Campilho RDSG · Composites Part B · 2009 · 40 · 14910.1016/j.compositesb.2008.10.008 ↗
6. Adams RD · Journal of Strain Analysis · 1974 · 9 · 18510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
7. Baker AA · Composite Structure · 1984 · 2 · 15310.1016/0263-8223(84)90025-4 ↗
9. Zhang H · Composites Part A · 1998 · 29 · 1464
10. da Silva LFM, and Öchsner A, editors.Modeling of adhesively bonded joints. Berlin: Springer; 2008.10.1007/978-3-540-79056-3 ↗
11. Semerdjiev S · 1970
12. 10.1163/15685610074219510.1163/156856100742195 ↗
13. da Silva LFM · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2007 · 27 · 22710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001 ↗
14. 10.1163/15685610677888426210.1163/156856106778884262 ↗
15. Pires I · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2003 · 23 · 21510.1016/S0143-7496(03)00024-1 ↗
16. Fitton MD · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2005 · 25 · 32910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.08.002 ↗
17. da Silva LFM · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2009 · 29 · 50910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009 ↗
18. Ganesh VK · Journal of Composite Materials · 2002 · 36 · 175710.1177/0021998302036014172 ↗
19. 10.1080/0021846090288031310.1080/00218460902880313 ↗
20. Tsai MY · Composite Structures · 1995 · 32 · 12310.1016/0263-8223(95)00059-3 ↗
21. Ashcroft IA · Composite Part A · 2001 · 32 · 4510.1016/S1359-835X(00)00131-7 ↗
22. Chaves FJP · Journal of Materials: Design and Applications · 2008 · 222 · 159
23. Adams RD · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 1987 · 7 · 6910.1016/0143-7496(87)90092-3 ↗
24. Dorn L · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 1993 · 13 · 2110.1016/0143-7496(93)90005-T ↗
25. Lang TP · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 1998 · 18 · 16710.1016/S0143-7496(97)00056-0 ↗
26. Vallée T · Composites Science and Technology · 2006 · 66 · 190310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.007 ↗
27. Vallée T · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2010 · 30 · 58310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.007 ↗
28. Cheuk PT · Composites Science and Technology · 2002 · 62 · 107910.1016/S0266-3538(02)00054-4 ↗
29. Rispler AR · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2000 · 20 · 22110.1016/S0143-7496(99)00047-0 ↗
30. 10.1080/0021846860807323810.1080/00218468608073238 ↗
31. Hildebrand M · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 1994 · 14 · 26110.1016/0143-7496(94)90039-6 ↗
32. 10.1080/0021846800807891910.1080/00218468008078919 ↗
33. Fessel G · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2007 · 27 · 57410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.016 ↗
34. 10.1163/016942411X58022510.1163/016942411X580225 ↗
35. Campilho RDSG · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2011 · 31 · 36310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.008 ↗
36. ASTM-E8M-04. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials (Metric); 2004.
37. da Silva LFM · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2008 · 22 · 1510.1163/156856108X292241 ↗
38. 10.1163/016942411X58008110.1163/016942411X580081 ↗
39. Goyal VK · Composite Structures · 2008 · 82 · 43410.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.029 ↗
40. Campilho RDSG · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2009 · 29 · 67810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.004 ↗
41. 10.1163/156856109X43304510.1163/156856109X433045 ↗
42. Campilho RDSG · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 2008 · 45 · 149710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.003 ↗
43. ABAQUS® HTML Documentation. Vélizy-Villacoublay Cedex, France: Dassault Systemes; 2009.
44. Jing J · Engineering Failure Analysis · 2009 · 16 · 157910.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.10.019 ↗
45. Reis P · Composite Structures · 2005 · 67 · 12510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.01.018 ↗