Incorporation of EGCG into an etch-and-rinse adhesive system: mechanical properties and bond strength to caries affected dentin
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated how a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor (EGCG) incorporated into an etch-and-rinse adhesive system (AS) affects the long-term microtensile bond strength (MTBS) to caries affected dentin (CAD) and flexural strength (FS) of AS. Forty CAD surfaces received acid conditioning and were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10): EGCG-PRE – dentin treatment with 200 μg/mL EGCG solution; EGCG-INC – 200 μg/mL EGCG solution incorporated into SA; CHX-PRE – dentin treatment with 2% digluconate solution; NT – no treatment. The AS (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE) was applied and resin composite blocks were built on the dentin. Beam-shaped specimens (0.8 mm2) were obtained submitted to MTBS testing following 24 h, 6 months or 1 year of water storage (WS). Adhesive interface was analyzed by SEM. FS testing was performed by preparing specimens with the adhesive system, with or without the EGCG solution (200 μg/mL) (n = 10). Tests were carried out in a universal machine (0.5 mm/min). MTBS data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test, whereas FS data, to the Student’s t-test (α = 0.05). MTBS values were not affected by EGCG application, either incorporated or used as a dentin treatment agent, regardless of the WS period; however, CHX negatively affected MTBS to CAD (p < 0.001). WS significantly reduced MTBS values (p < 0.001) from the 6-months time point. FS was not affected by EGCG incorporation into the SA (p = 0.2527). EGCG incorporation into AS was unable to maintain bond stability to CAD over time, whereas it did not compromise adhesive’s property.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Restorative Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil;
Administrative Technician, Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí, Urutaí, Brazil
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.00110.1016/j.cden.2017.06.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.00410.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.1020810.1002/jbm.10208 ↗
4. 10.1177/15440591040830030610.1177/154405910408300306 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.01210.1016/j.dental.2013.10.012 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.04010.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.040 ↗
7. 10.1177/0022034598077008100110.1177/00220345980770081001 ↗
8. 10.1177/002203451351697910.1177/0022034513516979 ↗
9. Gendron R · Clin Diagn Lab Immunol · 1999 · 6 · 43710.1128/CDLI.6.3.437-439.1999 ↗
10. 10.1177/002203451143532910.1177/0022034511435329 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00009-110.1016/S0167-4838(00)00009-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0003-9861(03)00221-210.1016/S0003-9861(03)00221-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.02010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.020 ↗
14. 10.2341/13-162-L10.2341/13-162-L ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.08.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.08.005 ↗
16. Santiago SL · J Adhes Dent · 2013 · 15 · 535
17. 10.1590/1678-77572015051810.1590/1678-775720150518 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.01310.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.013 ↗
19. Yiu CK · J Adhes Dent · 2012 · 14 · 355
20. 10.2341/18-112-L10.2341/18-112-L ↗
21. 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-011110.1590/1678-7757-2018-0111 ↗
22. 10.1590/0103-644020130009610.1590/0103-6440201300096 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.00710.1016/j.dental.2007.09.007 ↗
24. Sanabe ME · J Adhes Dent · 2011 · 13 · 117
25. 10.2341/05-14510.2341/05-145 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.018 ↗
27. 10.2341/08-5510.2341/08-55 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.b.1056010.1002/jbm.b.10560 ↗
29. 10.1177/002203451453804610.1177/0022034514538046 ↗
30. 10.1111/adj.1215010.1111/adj.12150 ↗
31. Ricci HA · J Adhes Dent · 2014 · 16 · 21