Influence of power frequency on the performance of SiC thin films deposited by pulsed DC magnetron sputtering
Source abstract
Abstract
Because of its high stability, good wear resistance, and high mechanical hardness, SiC is widely used in various mechanical parts as a protective film. However, there have been few reports published on the preparation of SiC films by pulsed DC magnetron sputtering. In this work, SiC films were deposited onto glass and ceramic substrates from a sintered SiC target through pulsed DC magnetron sputtering. The influence of the variation of the power pulse frequency (0 kHz, 50 kHz, 150 kHz, 250 kHz, and 300 kHz) on the film’s performance was studied. The surface morphology, structural characteristics, hardness, and adhesion strength of the deposited SiC films were investigated here. The results show that all the deposited films adhered well to the substrate. They were smooth, compact, and presented an amorphous structure. The film hardness was found to increase as the pulse frequency was increased. When the pulse frequency was 250 kHz, the resulting SiC film possessed optimal mechanical properties with a hardness of 25.74 GPa (measured using a nanometer indentation instrument) and an adhesion strength of about 36 N (measured by scratch tester).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Space Science and Physics, Shandong University at Weihai, Weihai, P. R. China;
The Key Lab of Guangdong for Modern Surface Engineering Technology, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Materials Surface Engineering Technology, Guangdong Institute of New Materials, Guangzhou, P. R. China;
School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University at Weihai, Weihai, P. R. China
Funding
Acknowledgements
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C5CP00601E10.1039/C5CP00601E ↗
2. 10.1007/s11664-004-0264-x10.1007/s11664-004-0264-x ↗
3. 10.1063/1.33706810.1063/1.337068 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.10678610.1063/1.106786 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11664-015-3949-410.1007/s11664-015-3949-4 ↗
6. 10.1080/01694243.2018.149452410.1080/01694243.2018.1494524 ↗
7. 10.1080/01694243.2018.145914910.1080/01694243.2018.1459149 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.31.L61610.1143/JJAP.31.L616 ↗
9. 10.1163/1568561025277117610.1163/15685610252771176 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11106-005-0028-z10.1007/s11106-005-0028-z ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03124.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03124.x ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0036687810.1007/BF00366878 ↗
13. 10.1109/TPHP.1976.113513710.1109/TPHP.1976.1135137 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10904-011-9481-y10.1007/s10904-011-9481-y ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.063 ↗
16. 10.1016/0955-2219(92)90094-T10.1016/0955-2219(92)90094-T ↗
17. 10.1021/cg901189k10.1021/cg901189k ↗
18. 10.1142/S021798490902194610.1142/S0217984909021946 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.58241310.1116/1.582413 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10765-012-1193-110.1007/s10765-012-1193-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.17910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.179 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.06310.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.063 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.00910.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.009 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.210207210.1063/1.2102072 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.194690010.1063/1.1946900 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.04.00510.1016/j.tsf.2017.04.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.07710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.077 ↗
28. Movchan BA · Phys Met Metallogr · 1969 · 28 · 83
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.04010.1016/j.msea.2007.02.040 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00665-210.1016/S0040-6090(97)00665-2 ↗
31. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.609-610.8210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.609-610.82 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01321-310.1016/S0040-6090(00)01321-3 ↗
33. Liu F · J. Wuhan Univ. Technol · 2007 · 29 · 55
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.06610.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.066 ↗