Experimental characterization of interlaminar shear failure in sandwich structures under three-point bending
Source abstract
Abstract
We applied an improved six-step phase-shifting method in digital photoelasticity to an adhesively bonded aluminum/epoxy/aluminum sandwich structure in order to study interlaminar shear failure behavior. Before and after three-point bending, a self-balanced thermal residual shear stress appeared on the interface because of the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between aluminum faces and epoxy core interlayer. At the beginning of loading, the shear stress in the core layer distributes continuously and forms shear bands tilting at a 45° direction. It then joins with the upper and bottom aluminum faces in order to realize the shear load transfer. As the bending load increases, the maximum interface shear stress occurs near the supports and a partially debonded region appears at the interface. The interfacial shear stress in the partially debonded region decreases rapidly until a shear failure occurs. A load–flexibility curve of the vibration-damping–type sandwich structure agrees well with the theoretical prediction of a laminated beam.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Higgins A · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2000 · 20 · 36710.1016/S0143-7496(00)00006-3 ↗
2. Shu X · Composite Structures · 2006 · 74 · 23710.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.009 ↗
3. Dadras P · Computer Structures · 1996 · 59 · 40710.1016/0045-7949(95)00278-2 ↗
4. Tsai MY · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 1991 · 28 · 105310.1016/0020-7683(91)90128-3 ↗
5. Adams RD · 1997
6. da Silva LFM · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2006 · 27 · 21610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.002 ↗
7. da Silva LFM · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2007 · 27 · 36210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007 ↗
8. Fabrizio G · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2007 · 74 · 34610.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.023 ↗
9. Ioka S · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 2007 · 44 · 623210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.024 ↗
10. Cotton J · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2001 · 21 · 6510.1016/S0143-7496(00)00031-2 ↗
11. Voloshin AS · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1992 · 43 · 47710.1016/0013-7944(92)90192-H ↗
12. Xu R · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2004 · 24 · 45510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.12.004 ↗
13. Zhao FM · Composites A · 2006 · 37 · 21610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.021 ↗
14. Patterson EA · Strain · 2002 · 38 · 2710.1046/j.0039-2103.2002.00004.x ↗
15. Lei ZK · Journal of Experimental Mechanics · 2004 · 19 · 393
16. Lei ZK · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · 2003 · 40 · 18910.1016/S0143-8166(02)00087-8 ↗
17. Ramesh K · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · 2000 · 33 · 38710.1016/S0143-8166(00)00076-2 ↗
18. Pinit P · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · 2007 · 45 · 79510.1016/j.optlaseng.2006.12.005 ↗
19. Lei ZK · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · 2009 · 47 · 70110.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.11.005 ↗
20. Kasimayan T · Experimental Techniques · 2010 · 34 · 4510.1111/j.1747-1567.2009.00537.x ↗
21. Chang CW · Measurement · 2008 · 41 · 86210.1016/j.measurement.2007.12.002 ↗
22. Quiroga JA · Applied Optics · 1997 · 36 · 839710.1364/AO.36.008397 ↗
23. Frocht MM · 1948
24. Sun XF · 2009
25. Whitney JM · 1987
26. Xiao XR · International Journal of Mechanical Sciences · 2008 · 50 · 6910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.05.005 ↗