Adherability and weldability of poly(lactic acid) and basalt fibre-reinforced poly(lactic acid)
Source abstract
Abstract
The adherability and weldability of pure poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and basalt fibre-reinforced PLA were investigated in this research. The joining efficiency rate is introduced as a comparative parameter among different joining processes. In the case of adhesive bonding, 16 different adhesives were used to join specimens together. The highest bond strength and joining efficiency rate for both the pure (16 MPa, 78%) and basalt fiber-reinforced (18 MPa, 44%) adhesive-bonded specimens was achieved with acrylate-based two-component adhesives. The bond strength and joining efficiency rates of bonded specimens manufactured with four welding technologies (hot gas welding, friction stir welding, ultrasonic welding, laser welding) were also investigated. The highest bond strength for both pure PLA and basalt fibre-reinforced PLA specimens (51 and 125 MPa, respectively) was attained by laser welding. The highest joining efficiency rate for pure PLA specimens (85%) was attained by ultrasonic welding, while it was achieved by laser welding for basalt-fibre reinforced PLA specimens (70%).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Polymer Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
MTA-BME Research Group for Composite Science and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
Funding
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia · The National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary · Hungarian Academy of Sciences
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Sin LT · 2012
2. Bastioli C · 2005
3. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.05.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.05.004 ↗
4. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.4210.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.42 ↗
5. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.5810.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.58 ↗
6. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0032110.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00321 ↗
7. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100136-3.00004-210.1016/B978-0-08-100136-3.00004-2 ↗
8. Akovali G · 2001 · 3
9. 10.3311/PPme.831910.3311/PPme.8319 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.10.01910.1016/j.wear.2012.10.019 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.04510.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.045 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.01.02510.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.01.025 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.82010.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.820 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.03.05410.1016/j.msec.2014.03.054 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.03210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.032 ↗
16. Czigány T · Periodica Polytech Ser Mech Eng · 2005 · 49 · 3
17. 10.1080/01694243.2016.117451010.1080/01694243.2016.1174510 ↗
18. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.1110.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.11 ↗
19. 10.1016/B978-0-323-35399-1.00006-510.1016/B978-0-323-35399-1.00006-5 ↗
20. Rotheiser J · 1999
21. Marczis B · Periodica Polytech Ser Mech Eng · 2002 · 46 · 117
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.01.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.01.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.12.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.12.006 ↗
25. 10.1002/pen.2191910.1002/pen.21919 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00586-011-1799-110.1007/s00586-011-1799-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.03.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.03.005 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.12.01410.1016/j.optlastec.2016.12.014 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.006 ↗
30. Czigány T · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Composite Materials · 2011 · 1
31. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
32. 10.1080/13621718.2016.116966910.1080/13621718.2016.1169669 ↗
33. 10.1080/13621718.2016.120417110.1080/13621718.2016.1204171 ↗
34. 10.1533/9780857096425.3.29610.1533/9780857096425.3.296 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.04.02010.1016/j.mee.2010.04.020 ↗
36. 10.1080/01694243.2016.116833810.1080/01694243.2016.1168338 ↗