journal article·1999-01

Adhesion of latex films. Part IV. Dominating interfacial effect of the surfactant

P.A. Gerin, Y. Grohens, R. Schirrer, Y. Holl

Publisher page

Abstract

Our aim was to study the effect of various surfactants on the adhesion properties of latex films. For this purpose, a model monodisperse, surfactant-free, core-shell latex was synthesized. The core was a random copolymer of styrene and butyl acrylate. The shell consisted of a styrene/butyl acrylate/methacrylic acid terpolymer with 10 wt% of methacrylic acid. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and various ethoxylated nonionic surfactants were post-added to the latex at increasing concentrations. The adhesion of the corresponding films was measured by peeling at 180°. The shapes of the curves relating the peel energy to the surfactant concentration were similar, irrespective of the nature of the surfactant, namely a decrease to a constant plateau level. This means that in these systems, the influence of a weak boundary layer at the interface dominates all other possible effects of the surfactant. This was confirmed by surface analysis and peel experiments with surfactant-free films contacted with spin-coated SDS layers of increasing thickness. The reasons why the deleterious interfacial effect of the surfactant overwhelms all others are discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao C. L. · Br. Polym. J. · 1989 · 21 · 15510.1002/pi.4980210210 ↗
2. 10.1163/156856196X0063410.1163/156856196X00634 ↗
3. 10.1163/156856199X0039810.1163/156856199X00398 ↗
4. Dobler F. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1992 · 152 · 1210.1016/0021-9797(92)90003-5 ↗
5. Dobler F. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1992 · 44 · 107510.1002/app.1992.070440617 ↗
6. Gerin P. A. · J. Chim. Phys. · 1995 · 92 · 104310.1051/jcp/1995921043 ↗
7. Andrade J. D. · 198810.1007/978-1-4684-1291-8 ↗
8. Juhue D. · J. Polym. Sci. Part B, Polym. Phys. · 1995 · 33 · 112310.1002/polb.1995.090330716 ↗
9. Bikerman J. J. · 1968
10. Kientz E. · Polym. Int. · 1994 · 34 · 12510.1002/pi.1994.210340201 ↗
11. Delgado, J., Kinning, D. J., Lu, Y. Y. and Tran, T. V. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Adhesion Society. Edited by: Ward, T. C. pp.342Myrtle Beach, SC: The Adhesion Society.
12. Guyot A. · Adv. Polym. Sci. · 1994 · 111 · 4310.1007/BFb0024126 ↗
13. Winnik, M. A. 1997.Emulsion Polymerization and Emulsion Polymers, Edited by: Lovell, P. A. and El- Aasser, M. S. 467New York: John Wiley.
14. Gent A. N. · J. Adhesion · 1972 · 3 · 28110.1080/00218467208072199 ↗
15. Andrews E. H. · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. · 1973 · 332 · 38510.1098/rspa.1973.0032 ↗
16. Maugis D. · J. Phys. D · 1978 · 11 · 198910.1088/0022-3727/11/14/011 ↗
17. Maugis, D. 1991.Adhesive Bonding, Edited by: Lee, L. H. 303New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4757-9006-1_11 ↗
18. Carre A. · J. Adhesion · 1984 · 17 · 13510.1080/00218468408079671 ↗
19. Johnson K. L. · Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. · 1971 · 324 · 30110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
20. Chaudhury M. K. · Langmuir · 1991 · 7 · 101310.1021/la00053a033 ↗