Tensile load-bearing capacity of co-cured double lap joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The co-cured joining method has several advantages over the adhesively bonded joining method because both the curing and the joining processes for the composite structures are achieved simultaneously. In this study, the tensile load-bearing capacities of co-cured double lap joints were investigated experimentally and compared with the analytical results calculated by finite element analysis. Co-cured double lap joint specimens with several bond parameters such as bond length, surface roughness, and stacking sequence of the composite laminate were fabricated and tested. From the experimental results, it was found that the failure mechanism of the co-cured double lap joint was cohesive failure by delamination at the first ply of the composite laminate in the co-cured double lap joint. Finally, optimum values of several bond parameters were determined. Analytical tensile load-bearing capacities of the co-cured double lap joints were calculated by the three-dimensional Tsai-Wu failure criterion using stress distributions obtained from finite element analysis. Keywords: CO-CURED DOUBLE LAP JOINTTENSILE LOAD-BEARING CAPACITYBOND LENGTHSURFACE ROUGHNESSSTACKING SEQUENCETSAI-WU FAILURE CRITERION
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Adams R. D. · J. Adhesion · 1977 · 9 · 110.1080/00218467708075095 ↗
2. Chon C. T. · J. Composite Mater. · 1984 · 18 · 29810.1177/002199838401800401 ↗
3. Hart-Smith, L. J. 1981.Joining of Composite Materials, ASTM Special Technical Publication, No. 749 Edited by: Kedward, K. T. 3–31. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM.10.1520/STP33472S ↗
4. Messler R. W. · 1993
5. 10.1163/15685610074214010.1163/156856100742140 ↗
6. Jones R. M. · Composite Struct. · 1993 · 25 · 20110.1016/0263-8223(93)90166-N ↗
7. He S. · J. Composite Mater. · 1994 · 28 · 11210.1177/002199839402800202 ↗
8. Olivier P. · Composite Sci. Technol. · 1998 · 58 · 64510.1016/S0266-3538(97)00137-1 ↗
9. Kim H. S. · Composite Struct. · 1995 · 32 · 59310.1016/0263-8223(95)00034-8 ↗
10. Choi J. H. · J. Composite Mater. · 1997 · 31 · 138110.1177/002199839703101402 ↗
11. Lee S. W. · J. Composite Mater. · 1997 · 31 · 218810.1177/002199839703102104 ↗
12. Cho D. H. · Composite Struct. · 1997 · 38 · 30910.1016/S0263-8223(97)00065-2 ↗
13. Cho D. H. · J. Composite Mater. · 1998 · 32 · 122110.1177/002199839803201205 ↗
14. Crane, L. W., Hamermesh, C. L. and Maus, L. March/April 1976.SAMPE JMarch/April, 6–9.
15. Parker B. M. · Composites · 1982 · 13 · 28010.1016/0010-4361(82)90011-8 ↗
16. Lee D. G. · J. Adhesion · 1991 · 35 · 3910.1080/00218469108030434 ↗
17. Renton J. W. · Eng. Fracture Mech. · 1975 · 7 · 4110.1016/0013-7944(75)90065-X ↗
18. Volkersen O. · Luftfahrtforschung · 1938 · 15 · 41
19. Goland M. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1944 · 11 · 1710.1115/1.4009336 ↗
20. Oplinger D. W. · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1994 · 31 · 256510.1016/0020-7683(94)90037-X ↗
21. Allman D. J. · Appl. Math. · 1977 · 30 · 415
22. Chen D. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1983 · 50 · 10910.1115/1.3166976 ↗
23. Wooly G. R. · J. Aircraft · 1971 · 8 · 81710.2514/3.44305 ↗
24. Adams R. D. · J. Strain Anal. · 1974 · 9 · 18510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
25. Crocombe A. D. · J. Adhesion · 1981 · 13 · 14110.1080/00218468108073182 ↗
26. Harris J. A. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1984 · 4 · 6510.1016/0143-7496(84)90103-9 ↗
27. Wegman R. F. · 1989
28. Choi J. H. · J. Composite Mater. · 1995 · 29 · 118110.1177/002199839502900903 ↗
29. 1995.Annual Book of ASTM Standards (General Products, Chemical Specialties, and End Use Products), Vol. 15, 205–208. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
30. 1998
31. Reddy J. N. · 1997