journal article·2006-01

A novel cumulative fatigue damage model for electronically-conductive adhesive joints under variable loading

Rajesh R. Gomatam, Erol Sancaktar

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes a novel cumulative fatigue damage life predictive model aimed at providing the design engineer an easy fatigue life predictive tool using experimental data. This encompasses an integrated approach of joint testing, analysis, and modeling. For this purpose, joints were prepared using stainless steel adherend specimens and a commercial silver-filled electronically conductive adhesive, and tested under monotonic and cyclic fatigue conditions, at 28°C, 20% relative humidity. Load–number of cycles (P–N) curves were generated for these specimens using load ratio R = 0.1 and R = 0.5 (R = P min/P max = σmin/σmax) at a cyclic frequency of 150 Hz. Fatigue life and failure behaviors due to cumulative fatigue damage were assessed using a novel experimental program. Experimental results revealed that most of the fatigue damage occurs during the latter part of the fatigue process and the combination of lower load ratio and higher maximum applied load has the most detrimental effect on the failure of the joint. Finally, a novel analytical model for fatigue life prediction under variable cyclic conditions was proposed using experimental data and a detailed stress analysis. Keywords: ELECTRONICALLY CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVESADHESIVE JOINTSCUMULATIVE FATIGUE DAMAGECYCLIC LOADINGFRACTUREENDURANCE LIMITP-N CURVECYCLIC CREEPFATIGUE LIFE PREDICTIVE MODEL
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Palmgren A. · Verfahrenstechinik · 1924 · 68 · 339
2. Miner M. A. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1945 · 67 · A15910.1115/1.4009458 ↗
3. Coffin L. F. · Trans. ASME · 1956 · 78 · 527
4. Miller K. J. · J. Strain Ana · 1970 · 5 · 17710.1243/03093247V053177 ↗
5. Richart F. E. · Proc. ASTM · 1948 · 48 · 767
6. Marco S. M. · Trans. ASME · 1954 · 76 · 627
7. Fatemi A. · Int. J. Fatigue · 1998 · 20 · 910.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
8. Jiang M. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1995 · 52 · 97110.1016/0013-7944(95)00103-3 ↗
9. Bhattacharya B. · Int. J. Fatigue · 1998 · 20 · 63110.1016/S0142-1123(98)00032-2 ↗
10. Zheng X. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1999 · 63 · 55710.1016/S0013-7944(99)00038-7 ↗
11. Franke L. · Int. J. Fatigue · 1999 · 21 · 76110.1016/S0142-1123(99)00045-6 ↗
12. Yan J. H. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2000 · 22 · 48110.1016/S0142-1123(00)00021-9 ↗
13. Svensson T. · Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2002 · 25 · 87110.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00573.x ↗
14. Min L. · Int. J. Fatigue · 1995 · 17 · 55910.1016/0142-1123(96)81216-3 ↗
15. Kuroda M. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2001 · 24 · 69910.1016/S0142-1123(01)00170-0 ↗
16. Found M. S. · Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2003 · 26 · 1710.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00583.x ↗
17. Kosut J. · Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 2002 · 25 · 57510.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00507.x ↗
18. Zheng X. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2001 · 23 · 75110.1016/S0142-1123(01)00040-8 ↗
19. Yao W. X. · Composit. Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 60 · 5910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00100-1 ↗
20. Noguchi H. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1995 · 51 · 45710.1016/0013-7944(94)00282-M ↗
21. Fukuoka C. · Scripta Mater. · 1996 · 34 · 149710.1016/1359-6462(95)00685-0 ↗
22. Tang S. S. · Int. J. Fatigue · 1996 · 18 · 17910.1016/0142-1123(95)00109-3 ↗
23. Cusumano J. P. · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2000 · 37 · 639710.1016/S0020-7683(99)00042-6 ↗
24. Seo D.-C. · Composit. Struct. · 1999 · 47 · 52510.1016/S0263-8223(00)00016-7 ↗
25. Fu M. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2003 · 25 · 18310.1016/S0142-1123(02)00115-9 ↗
26. 10.1163/15685610484029110.1163/156856104840291 ↗
27. 10.1163/15685610484049910.1163/156856104840499 ↗
28. Gomatam R. R. · 2002
29. 10.1163/156856104270832210.1163/1568561042708322 ↗