Effects of contact time, humidity, and surface roughness on the adhesion hysteresis of polydimethylsiloxane
Source abstract
Abstract
Dynamic contact mechanics experiments have been performed on small polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) lenses and several substrates in both ambient air and in dry nitrogen. The experimental results are analyzed with the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts theory. While the theory adequately describes the approach data, it is unable to account for the large hysteresis observed upon retraction. Adhesion hysteresis is shown to scale with the roughness of the substrate, the hydrophilicty of the substrate, the time of contact, and the ambient humidity. The experimental results also demonstrate that this method is sensitive to changes in the surface energy of the substrate. The cumulative adhesion hysteresis is quantified and is shown to be largest for rough, hydrophilic substrates in relatively high humidity and smallest for smooth substrates in dry nitrogen. The origin of the hysteresis is analyzed by considering favorable interfacial bonding resulting from water-mediated bonding between the substrate and oxygen atoms in the PDMS backbone or other polar species on the polymer surface. Capillary forces are also postulated to contribute to the cumulative adhesion hysteresis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Israelachvili, J. N. 1995.Handbook of Surface Imaging Visualization, Edited by: Hubbard, A. T. 793–816. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
2. Gent A. N. · J. Polym. Sci.: Part A · 1971 · 29 · 65910.1002/pol.1971.160090408 ↗
3. Satas D. · 198910.1007/978-1-4757-0866-0 ↗
4. Johnson K. L. · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1971 · 324 · 30110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
5. Carpick R. · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 116310.1021/cr960068q ↗
6. Machtle P. · Thin Solid Films · 1998 · 330 · 110.1016/S0040-6090(98)00793-7 ↗
7. Derjaguin B. V. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1980 · 77 · 9110.1016/0021-9797(80)90419-1 ↗
8. Maugis D. · Colloid Interface Sci. · 1992 · 150 · 24310.1016/0021-9797(92)90285-T ↗
9. Greenwood J. A. · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1997 · 453 · 127710.1098/rspa.1997.0070 ↗
10. Ting T. C. T. · J. Appl. Mech. · 1966 · 12 · 84510.1115/1.3625192 ↗
11. Deruelle M. · Macromolecules · 1995 · 28 · 741910.1021/ma00126a021 ↗
12. Silberzan P. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 246610.1021/la00019a073 ↗
13. Ahn D. · Macromolecules · 1996 · 29 · 438110.1021/ma9518924 ↗
14. Luengo G. · Langmuir · 1998 · 14 · 387310.1021/la971304a ↗
15. Chaudhury M. K. · Langmuir · 1991 · 7 · 101310.1021/la00053a033 ↗
16. Chaudhury M. K. · J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. · 1993 · 7 · 66910.1163/156856193X00907 ↗
17. Yoshizawa H. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 412810.1021/j100118a033 ↗
18. 10.1163/156856194X0058210.1163/156856194X00582 ↗
19. Gent A. N. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1982 · 27 · 435710.1002/app.1982.070271125 ↗
20. Fuller K. N. G. · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1975 · 345 · 32710.1098/rspa.1975.0138 ↗
21. Maugis D. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1978 · 11 · 198910.1088/0022-3727/11/14/011 ↗
22. The energy release rate has also been shown to depend strongly on the crack velocity as shownin the Maugis paper referenced above (Ref. [21]). Such crack velocity effect experiments wereperformed over wide time scales and under significantly different experimental conditions, eitherat fixed grips (i.e. imposed displacement) or fixed load. The JKR experiment does not satisfyeither of these conditions. Crack velocity effects are examined by imposing a relatively smallstrain on the interface, and then monitoring the decrease in contact area. Most significantly, theinterface is not carried to rupture. We seek here to determine the effects of contact time on theadhesion, while minimizing possible crack velocity effects by using a constant rate of approachand retraction for all measurements reported here
23. Mangipudi V. · Langmuir · 1995 · 11 · 1910.1021/la00001a006 ↗
24. There have been several other methods suggested in the literature to determine K fromP vs a (contact area radius) data. As detailed in Ahn and Shull (Ref. [13]), K can bedetermined independently from W by simultaneously acquiring the height of the lens. Whenthe experimental data in Figs 1 and 2 were fitted according to the procedure, K was determinedto be 2:2 ¢ 104 Pa with r2 D 0:996. When this value of K, along with the measured radius ofthe lens R was used to calculate the work of adhesionWa, no statisticallysigni. cant . t could beobtained. In summary, for the data presented in this report, the three-parametermodel was foundto give excellent statistical agreement and provided an expedient reference curve for numericalintegration
25. Tan Z. · Polymer · 1993 · 35 · 323010.1016/0032-3861(94)90127-9 ↗
26. Liu Y. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 123510.1021/la950504o ↗
27. During the static contact period, a small increase in contact area was observed due to creepeffects. However, this increase did not contribute significantly to the overall adhesion hysteresis
28. Although not shown here, when the humidity was controlled at an intermediate value (15%),values of cumulative adhesion hysteresis between 0 and 37% were observed. Likewise, at higherhumidity (80%) the magnitude of UJKR was larger and increased at a faster rate in time than at37%
29. Holland L. · 1966
30. Tiberg F. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 230110.1021/la00019a046 ↗
31. Odelius M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 285510.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2855 ↗
32. Parker J. L. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1989 · 93 · 612110.1021/j100353a034 ↗
33. Hu J. · Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 344 · 22110.1016/0039-6028(95)00858-6 ↗
34. Beaglehole D. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1992 · 96 · 339510.1021/j100187a040 ↗
35. Tiberg F. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 229410.1021/la00019a045 ↗
36. Kinney D. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1993 · 115 · 678610.1021/ja00068a041 ↗
37. Bassindale, A. and Taylor, P. 1989.The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds, Edited by: Patai, S. and Rappoport, Z. Vol. 1, 810–839. Chichester: JohnWiley.
38. Jarvis N. L. · J. Polym Sci.:Part C, Polym. Lett. · 1971 · 34 · 101
39. Kendrick, T., Parbhoo, B. and White, J. 1989.The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds: Part2, Edited by: Patai, S. and Rappoport, Z. Vol. 2, 1290–1361. Chichester: JohnWiley.
40. Fowkes, F. M. 1967.Treatise on Adhesion and Adhesives, Edited by: Patrick, R. L. Vol. 1, 325–447. New York: Marcel Dekker.
41. Noll W. · Kolloid Z.Z. Polym. · 1965 · 204 · 9410.1007/BF01500384 ↗
42. Throughout this text, hydrostaticpressure will refer to pressure present within surface roughnesssealed by an interface with the polymer
43. Bailey A. I. · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1967 · 301 · 4710.1098/rspa.1967.0189 ↗