journal article·2026-02-16

Influence of printing orientation on power-law hardening and ductile damage parameters for 3D-printed SS316L steel: experimental and FEA approach

Ambuj Saxena, Ashish Kumar Srivastava, Nagendra Kumar Maurya, Tarun Kumar Gupta

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present investigation, the selective laser melting (SLM) technique has been utilized for the 3-dimensional printing (tensile test specimens) of SS316L steel powder at 00 (horizontal) and 900 (vertical) angles. Further, an experimental and finite element analysis approach has been made to analyse the effect of printed orientation or direction on the Hollomon power law parameters (strain hardening exponent (n) and strength coefficient (K)) and ductile damage parameters (fracture strain (εf), stress triaxiality (η) and strain rate (ε̇)). The influence of printing orientation on plastic deformation behavior has also been analysed. The results revealed that 00 angle 3D-printed specimens exhibited 11.05%, 21.97% and 9.50% more yield strength, tensile strength and elongation than 900 angle 3D-printed tensile test specimens. Further, the strain hardening exponent (n) and strength coefficient (K) (Hollomon power law hardening model parameters) for 00 angle 3D-printed specimens are 35.80% and 32.47% more than the 900 angle 3D-printed tensile test specimens respectively. The fracture strain for 00 angle 3D-printed specimens is 37.82% less than the 900 angle 3D-printed tensile test specimens. The percentage difference between FEA and experimental results is less than 5% which shows the good prediction capability of estimated Hollomon power law parameters and ductile damage model parameters with developed FEA model for 00 and 900 3D printed specimens.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, G.L. Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s13632-018-0433-610.1007/s13632-018-0433-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.04510.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10057810.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100578 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.13110.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.131 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cja.2015.01.01310.1016/j.cja.2015.01.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.09210.1016/j.msea.2011.11.092 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14243910.1016/j.msea.2021.142439 ↗
9. 10.1115/PVP2019-9338410.1115/PVP2019-93384 ↗
10. 10.1109/JMEMS.2018.287515810.1109/JMEMS.2018.2875158 ↗
11. 10.1007/s13369-020-04519-110.1007/s13369-020-04519-1 ↗
12. 10.1007/s40430-018-1381-410.1007/s40430-018-1381-4 ↗
13. 10.1520/JTE10422610.1520/JTE104226 ↗
14. 10.1080/15376494.2024.231185310.1080/15376494.2024.2311853 ↗
15. 10.3390/jmmp204006910.3390/jmmp2040069 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10325010.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103250 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.00710.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.06110.1016/j.msea.2016.11.061 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.406438310.1115/1.4064383 ↗
20. 10.1557/s43578-021-00468-z10.1557/s43578-021-00468-z ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14064910.1016/j.msea.2020.140649 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2018.07.00110.1016/j.pnsc.2018.07.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.05810.1016/j.msea.2017.04.058 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14008610.1016/j.msea.2020.140086 ↗
25. 10.17973/MMSJ.2024_02_202313410.17973/MMSJ.2024_02_2023134 ↗
26. Standard, A.S.T.M.: E8. Standard test method for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2004.
27. 10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01163-910.1016/S0997-7538(01)01163-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0020-7225(01)00040-410.1016/S0020-7225(01)00040-4 ↗
29. 10.1002/mawe.20230011810.1002/mawe.202300118 ↗