Layer-by-layer manufacturing of titanium plate: fabrication, microstructure, mechanical, and numerical prediction of tensile test
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the microstructural evolution, crystallographic texture, and mechanical performance of commercially pure titanium (Ti CP-Grade 2) fabricated using TIG-aided Layer-by-Layer Manufacturing (LLM). The fabricated plate exhibited a defect-free, equiaxed microstructure dominated by acicular and serrated α-laths, which contributed significantly to its mechanical strength. Texture analysis revealed a strong α-phase alignment ({0001}), indicating a direct influence of thermal history on grain orientation and material integrity. The presence of α, β, and α + β phases confirmed through X-ray diffraction was found to govern the enhanced tensile strength, hardness, and impact resistance compared to wrought titanium. Furthermore, finite element simulations demonstrated excellent agreement with experimental tensile data, validating the predictive accuracy of the mechanical behaviour based on electron backscatter diffraction spectroscopy -derived texture and phase composition. These findings establish a robust framework for the predictive design and performance optimization of titanium components in advanced engineering application.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Additive Manufacturing, Chennai Institute of Technology
Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10652710.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106527 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-005-0447-810.1007/s10853-005-0447-8 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12666-020-01915-x10.1007/s12666-020-01915-x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.02210.1016/j.addma.2018.11.022 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.027 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10914210.1016/j.matdes.2020.109142 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.10.06410.1016/j.matlet.2016.10.064 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10028110.1016/j.mtla.2019.100281 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13828910.1016/j.msea.2019.138289 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.intermet.2021.10727710.1016/j.intermet.2021.107277 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.12210.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.122 ↗
12. 10.1080/01694243.2023.228977010.1080/01694243.2023.2289770 ↗
13. 10.1201/9781032665351-1410.1201/9781032665351-14 ↗
14. 10.1080/01694243.2023.224164210.1080/01694243.2023.2241642 ↗
15. Singh S, Kumar R, Kumar R, et al. Aluminum metal composites primed by fused deposition modeling-assisted investment casting: hardness, surface, wear, and dimensional properties. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl. 2022;236(3):674–691.
16. 10.1016/S0168-874X(03)00096-910.1016/S0168-874X(03)00096-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.finel.2006.05.00410.1016/j.finel.2006.05.004 ↗
18. 10.1177/1464420721106511410.1177/14644207211065114 ↗
19. Kumar SM, Shanmugam NS. Finite element simulation for tensile and impact test of activated TIG welding of AISI 321 austenitic stainless steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng. Part L. 2019;233:2323–2334.
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.01810.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.018 ↗
21. 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a000372810.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0003728 ↗
22. Denny PE, Metzbower EA. Laser beam welding of titanium. Weld J, 1989;68:342s–348s.
23. 10.1007/s00170-011-3299-110.1007/s00170-011-3299-1 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11661-012-1444-610.1007/s11661-012-1444-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10059010.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12540-017-7094-x10.1007/s12540-017-7094-x ↗
27. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03181610.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031816 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.01010.1016/j.addma.2018.08.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.03810.1016/j.msea.2013.11.038 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.02210.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.04410.1016/j.msea.2010.12.044 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00124-410.1016/S0142-1123(01)00124-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)02034-710.1016/S0921-5093(00)02034-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.09810.1016/j.msea.2014.06.098 ↗
35. 10.1051/matecconf/2016801400610.1051/matecconf/20168014006 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10464810.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104648 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10478710.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104787 ↗
38. Sinha A Suresh KS. Deep learning based dimple segmentation for quantitative fractography. arXiv: 2007.02267v3. 2020:1–8.
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10105110.1016/j.addma.2020.101051 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10626810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106268 ↗