journal article·2024-11-16

Microstructure and properties of multi-layer laser cladding Cu-10Pb-10Sn anti-friction coating

Xianfen Li, Junyang Ye, Huimin Cheng, Peng Hua

Publisher page

Abstract

The preliminary experimental results show that the laser cladding technology can produce a well-formed single-layer lead bronze cladding layer with a thickness of 250 μm. The ideal process parameters of the single-layer laser cladding test were selected to study the multi-layer cladding, and the microstructure and properties of the multi-layer cladding were evaluated. The results show that, the multi-layer cladding is composed of α-Cu, Cu41Sn11, Cu5.6 Sn, Pb, and SnO2 phases. There are fine equiaxed crystals at the top of the cladding layer while columnar crystals growing perpendicular to the fusion line at the bottom. The maximum hardness of cladding layer is 248.2 HV near the bottom fusion line. The wear mechanism of multi-layer cladding layer combines abrasive wear and adhesive wear, with wear weight loss and average friction coefficient of 0.0025 g and 0.1161, respectively. The average shear strength between the substrate and the cladding layer is 129 MPa, the shear fracture mode is ductile fracture. Compared with single-layer cladding, the anti-friction performance of multi-layer cladding is significantly improved.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China

Ministry of Education, Engineering Research Center of High Performance Copper Alloy Materials and Processing, Hefei, China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40516-016-0025-810.1007/s40516-016-0025-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.05.03610.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.05.036 ↗
3. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab0d7610.1088/2053-1591/ab0d76 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11665-022-06604-y10.1007/s11665-022-06604-y ↗
5. 10.3139/147.10026810.3139/147.100268 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.993.37410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.993.374 ↗
7. 10.1111/ffe.1244010.1111/ffe.12440 ↗
8. Chen GY, Chen C, Bu C, et al. Numerical simulation and experiment for on-line truing and dressing of bronze-bonded diamond grinding wheels with laser. Laser Technol. 2012;36(4):433–437.
9. 10.1016/0301-679X(82)90084-610.1016/0301-679X(82)90084-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/0043-1648(92)90107-J10.1016/0043-1648(92)90107-J ↗
11. 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.06.03110.1016/j.triboint.2015.06.031 ↗
12. Wu MC, Yu AB, Wei JL, et al. Influences of cladding materials on cracks and hardnesses of laser cladding chip breakers on high speed steel cutting tools. China Mech Eng. 2019;30(13):1607–1620.
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.06.01510.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.06.015 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.10.00510.1016/j.optlastec.2015.10.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.01.09810.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.01.098 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.09.04410.1016/j.optlastec.2016.09.044 ↗
17. 10.1007/s40194-017-0495-010.1007/s40194-017-0495-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/0043-1648(65)90171-710.1016/0043-1648(65)90171-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.intermet.2012.10.00410.1016/j.intermet.2012.10.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10691510.1016/j.optlastec.2021.106915 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2022.208549910.1080/01694243.2022.2085499 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.12888710.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.128887 ↗
23. 10.2478/aut-2020-000410.2478/aut-2020-0004 ↗
24. 10.1002/adem.20230042610.1002/adem.202300426 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-023-09213-910.1007/s10853-023-09213-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10854910.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108549 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.triboint.2021.10687210.1016/j.triboint.2021.106872 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.05110.1016/j.msea.2018.02.051 ↗
29. 10.1080/01694243.2018.142986010.1080/01694243.2018.1429860 ↗