Temperature and residual stress field analysis in double-pulse MIG welding of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy thin sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurately predicting the weld temperature field and post-weld residual stress field is of utmost significance for comprehending the composition of welded structures and enhancing their service performance. In this study, the double-pulse MIG welding process of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy thin sheets was investigated. A dynamic combined heat source model, consisting of double ellipse and double ellipsoid heat sources, was proposed based on weld bead morphology and the current variation during the welding process. The temperature and residual stress fields were numerically simulated and experimentally measured using thermocouple temperature measurements and blind hole methods, respectively. Simulation results of the combined heat source model were found to be accurate and in good agreement with the experimental data. The effects of welding fixtures and convective heat transfer coefficients on the results were also considered. The welding temperature and post-weld residual stress properties of the welded structure were thoroughly examined. During the welding process, the highest temperature is about 1500 °C and the maximum longitudinal residual stress occurs in the heat-affected zone, which is approximately 250 MPa, slightly lower than the yield strength of the base material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Automobile Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.102210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.1022 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.02.00110.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.02.001 ↗
3. 10.1080/01694243.2022.202807310.1080/01694243.2022.2028073 ↗
4. 10.3390/met1106099510.3390/met11060995 ↗
5. 10.1080/01694243.2020.174948510.1080/01694243.2020.1749485 ↗
6. 10.1080/01694243.2020.181677810.1080/01694243.2020.1816778 ↗
7. 10.1080/01694243.2018.151650310.1080/01694243.2018.1516503 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10341110.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103411 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1305122210.3390/ma13051222 ↗
10. 10.2298/TSCI210131181B10.2298/TSCI210131181B ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10930210.1016/j.tws.2022.109302 ↗
12. 10.1007/s43452-021-00189-410.1007/s43452-021-00189-4 ↗
13. 10.1243/09544054JEM188610.1243/09544054JEM1886 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.06.00210.1016/j.jmapro.2014.06.002 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00170-017-0844-610.1007/s00170-017-0844-6 ↗
16. 10.1142/S021798491950405010.1142/S0217984919504050 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00170-014-6529-510.1007/s00170-014-6529-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.09.00310.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.09.003 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-016-8587-310.1007/s00170-016-8587-3 ↗
20. 10.1080/09377255.2018.151869210.1080/09377255.2018.1518692 ↗
21. 10.1080/10426914.2015.110386310.1080/10426914.2015.1103863 ↗
22. 10.3390/met1103050810.3390/met11030508 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0266733310.1007/BF02667333 ↗
24. Pavelic V, Tanbakuchi R, Uyehara OA, et al. Experimental and computed temperature histories in gas tungsten-arc welding of thin plates. Weld J. 1969;48(7):295–305.
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.00410.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00161-210.1016/S0924-0136(99)00161-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.00610.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.006 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00170-018-2516-610.1007/s00170-018-2516-6 ↗
29. Wu CS. Fluid flow and heat transfer in GMA weld pools. Weld J. 1988;67(3):70–75.
30. 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63953-X10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63953-X ↗
31. 10.1007/s00170-011-3829-x10.1007/s00170-011-3829-x ↗
32. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.12.00510.1016/j.vacuum.2009.12.005 ↗
33. 10.1016/S1003-6326(19)64966-610.1016/S1003-6326(19)64966-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.10.00910.1016/j.optlastec.2017.10.009 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0265388210.1007/BF02653882 ↗
36. Xu GX, Wu CS, Qin GL, et al. Numerical analysis of temperature profile and weld dimension in laser + pulsed gas metal arc welding hybrid welding. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng. 2011;225(4):528–542.
37. 10.1155/2018/795060710.1155/2018/7950607 ↗
38. 10.3390/met902014610.3390/met9020146 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.simpat.2011.09.00410.1016/j.simpat.2011.09.004 ↗
40. 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.0017410.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00174 ↗
41. 10.1088/0022-3727/34/3/31710.1088/0022-3727/34/3/317 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0267022610.1007/BF02670226 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.00810.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.008 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.01210.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.012 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.00910.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.009 ↗
46. 10.3390/met1007088510.3390/met10070885 ↗