journal article·2026-02

Waste to wealth: development of cladding flux from steel slag for submerged arc welding

Navneet Goyal, Kulwant Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

A novel methodology has been developed which permits to transform waste slag into welding flux meant for stainless steel cladding. The developed flux has been applied for stainless steel cladding using submerged arc welding process. The claddings prepared using developed flux has been evaluated in terms of bead geometry, mechanical properties and chemical composition. The depth of penetration, weld bead width and height of reinforcement achieved with developed flux are 7.64 mm, 14.01 mm, and 4.07 mm, respectively, which are superior than obtained with fresh flux (8.05 mm, 12.85 mm, and 3.44 mm), as far as cladding is concerned. It observed that the developed flux is capable to produce chemical composition of claddings as per ASME SFA 5.4 standard. The percentage of chromium, nickel and manganese in claddings is 18.1%, 8.56% and 1.04% respectively which satisfy the ASME requirements. The side bend test proves a good bonding strength between substrate and claddings. The hardness of claddings produced with developed flux is also comparable with that of fresh flux. The average hardness of cladding produced with developed flux is 459 Hv, compared with that of fresh flux (435 Hv). The cost of developed flux is 54.86% economical than that of fresh flux. This research advocates that steel slag could be utilized as a raw material for manufacturing welding flux for stainless steel cladding.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Extraction and Separation Processes · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, SLIET, Longowal

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. World Steel Association. Fact sheet: steel industry co-products. China; 2021. Available from: https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/Fact-sheet-Steel-industry-co-products.pdf
2. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.04510.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.045 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13387610.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133876 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.11844910.1016/j.powtec.2023.118449 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10163-018-0711-z10.1007/s10163-018-0711-z ↗
6. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.06.00210.1016/j.resconrec.2007.06.002 ↗
7. 10.1142/S021968672050014610.1142/S0219686720500146 ↗
8. 10.1177/0954406222108925310.1177/09544062221089253 ↗
9. 10.1088/1757-899X/1225/1/01203810.1088/1757-899X/1225/1/012038 ↗
10. 10.1080/02670836.2022.211652810.1080/02670836.2022.2116528 ↗
11. 10.1080/01694243.2016.126684410.1080/01694243.2016.1266844 ↗
12. 10.1080/01694243.2019.167708710.1080/01694243.2019.1677087 ↗
13. 10.1080/01694243.2023.219231410.1080/01694243.2023.2192314 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12046-013-0182-910.1007/s12046-013-0182-9 ↗
15. Brooks JA, Lambert FJJr. The effects of phosphorus, sulfur and ferrite content on weld cracking of type 309 stainless steel. Weld J. 1978;57(5):139s–143s.
16. De Rissone NM, Farias JP, Bott ID, et al. ANSI/AWS A5.1-91 E6013 rutile electrodes: the effect of calcite. Weld J Suppl. 2002;81(7):113S–124S.
17. 10.1007/s12046-018-0782-510.1007/s12046-018-0782-5 ↗
18. Kohno R, Takami T, Mori N, et al. New fluxes of improved weld metal toughness for HSLA steels. Weld J. 1982;61(12):373.
19. Ferrera KP, Olson DL. Performance of the MnO–SiO2–CaO system as a welding flux. Weld Res Suppl. 1975;54:211s–215s.