journal article·2023-02-01

Experimental investigation on bond-slip behavior of self-compacting rubberized concrete-filled steel tubes

Xiaojun Ke, Zhukai Tang, Yanying Tao

Publisher page

Abstract

The bond strength between materials is the basis of the cooperative work of composite structures. This study aims to investigate the bonding performance of push-out tests conducted on self-compacting rubberized concrete-filled steel tubes (SCRCFST). The rubber content, particle size, interface bonding length, and water–cement ratio were varied to evaluate their impact on bond strength. The failure mode and failure mechanism were analyzed. The bond damage and energy consumption capacity were investigated. Moreover, this study reveals the characteristics of the stress–slip curve and derives the characteristic equations from reviewing the different points. Test results indicate that rubber particles enhance the energy dissipation capacity of specimens after reaching ultimate bond strength. Furthermore, bond strength decreases with the increase of rubber particles size and water–cement ratio, while the bonding length is barely impacted. It is worth noting that the bonding strength increases slightly at 10% rubber content. The main contribution of this work is to fill the gap in the bonding performance of SCRCFST and guide engineering utilization.HIGHLIGHTSSeventeen cylindrical specimens of SCRCFST performed a push-out test by monotonous loading.Bond damage degree and energy dissipation capacity were investigated.Increasing rubber-related parameters negatively affected the bond properties of the structure.Bond strength equations were proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, PR China

Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, PR China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/01694243.2016.121501010.1080/01694243.2016.1215010 ↗
2. 10.1080/01694243.2016.123139410.1080/01694243.2016.1231394 ↗
3. 10.1080/01694243.2020.185193710.1080/01694243.2020.1851937 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:4(314)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:4(314) ↗
5. 10.1080/01694243.2016.118986910.1080/01694243.2016.1189869 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.022 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.06510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.065 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.013 ↗
9. Strukar K · IOP Conference Series: Mater Sci Eng C · 2020 · 867 · 86710.1088/1757-899X/867/1/012038 ↗
10. 10.1155/2020/885473010.1155/2020/8854730 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000356010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003560 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.013 ↗
13. 10.3844/ajeassp.2008.40.4410.3844/ajeassp.2008.40.44 ↗
14. 10.1080/01694243.2016.126305610.1080/01694243.2016.1263056 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:3(206)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:3(206) ↗
16. 10.1002/eqe.291410.1002/eqe.2914 ↗
17. Teng J · J Archit Eng Environ Eng · 2011 · 33 · 1
18. Virdi KS · 1975
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12153110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121531 ↗
20. 10.1080/01694243.2019.160291310.1080/01694243.2019.1602913 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11307810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113078 ↗
22. 10.1080/01694243.2012.68755410.1080/01694243.2012.687554 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1406152910.3390/ma14061529 ↗
24. Chen ZP · J Build Eng · 2017 · 38 · 133
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12173010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121730 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.01510.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.015 ↗
27. Assaggaf RA, All MR, et al. Properties of concrete with untreated and treated crumb rubber - A review. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;11:1754–1798.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.030 ↗
29. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.2810.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.28 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.02210.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10134610.1016/j.jobe.2020.101346 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:5(477)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:5(477) ↗
33. Kang XL. · 2008
34. BS5400-5 Steel. Concrete and composite bridges – part 5: code of practice for the design of composite bridges. London: British Standard Institution; 2005.
35. GB8076-2008. Concrete admixtures. Beijing: Chinese Standardization Administration; 2008.
36. JGJ/T 283-2012 · 2012
37. Chen YL. Study on mechanical performance of rubber concrete. Hubei: Hubei University of Technology; 2015. (in Chinese).
38. Yang M. Research on basic mechanical performance of waste rubber concrete. Shengyang: Shenyang University; 2012. (in Chinese).
39. Shang WB. Experimental study on mechanical properties and impermeability of recycled rubber concrete. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power; 2019. (in Chinese).
40. Xiao JZ · J Build. Eng · 2005 · 8 · 197
41. GB/T 228-2010 · 2010
42. 10.3389/fmats.2021.64351010.3389/fmats.2021.643510 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.09.00610.1016/j.jcsr.2010.09.006 ↗
44. Xu JJ · J Build Eng · 2013 · 34 · 148
45. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11770710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117707 ↗
46. 10.1163/156856105492993710.1163/1568561054929937 ↗
47. Zaoiai S · Asian J Civ Eng · 2016 · 17 · 817