journal article·2020-07-02

Mixed-mode I+II fracture characterisation of composite bonded joints

R. D. F. Moreira, M. F. S. F. de Moura, F. G. A. Silva, F. M. G. Ramírez, J. S. Rodrigues

Publisher page

Abstract

This work addresses fracture characterisation of composite bonded joints under mixed-mode I+II loading. A proper strategy, including only two different loading conditions applied to five tests, is performed to obtain the fracture law describing the mixed-mode fracture behaviour. The peel test loading condition is employed to characterise fracture under pure mode I loading considering a symmetrical double-cantilever beam specimen and under mixed-mode I+II with mode I supremacy with an asymmetrical double-cantilever beam specimen. Three-point bending loading condition was also employed. The end-notched flexure test was used to characterise fracture under pure mode II, while the asymmetric single-leg bending tests were performed to cover mixed-mode I+II loading with mode II predominance up to a mode-mixity with moderate mode I prevalence. A methodology using cohesive zone modelling was applied to perform loading mode partition, which is crucial for an appropriate identification of the criterion describing the fracture behaviour of these joints.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

INEGI – Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Porto, Portugal;

Faculdade de Engenharia, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10853-008-2646-610.1007/s10853-008-2646-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.00310.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.027 ↗
4. Wahab MMA · Int Scholar Res Not · 2012 · 2012 · 1
5. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.027 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.007 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0036783810.1007/BF00367838 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.009 ↗
11. 10.2514/3.2520410.2514/3.25204 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00048-210.1016/S0143-7496(99)00048-2 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x ↗
14. 10.1515/hf.2010.04110.1515/hf.2010.041 ↗
15. 10.1080/01694243.2013.84535710.1080/01694243.2013.845357 ↗
16. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-310.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-3 ↗
17. 10.1080/01694243.2017.130749710.1080/01694243.2017.1307497 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.022 ↗