Mixed-mode I+II fracture characterisation of composite bonded joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This work addresses fracture characterisation of composite bonded joints under mixed-mode I+II loading. A proper strategy, including only two different loading conditions applied to five tests, is performed to obtain the fracture law describing the mixed-mode fracture behaviour. The peel test loading condition is employed to characterise fracture under pure mode I loading considering a symmetrical double-cantilever beam specimen and under mixed-mode I+II with mode I supremacy with an asymmetrical double-cantilever beam specimen. Three-point bending loading condition was also employed. The end-notched flexure test was used to characterise fracture under pure mode II, while the asymmetric single-leg bending tests were performed to cover mixed-mode I+II loading with mode II predominance up to a mode-mixity with moderate mode I prevalence. A methodology using cohesive zone modelling was applied to perform loading mode partition, which is crucial for an appropriate identification of the criterion describing the fracture behaviour of these joints.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
INEGI – Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Porto, Portugal;
Faculdade de Engenharia, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10853-008-2646-610.1007/s10853-008-2646-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.00310.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.027 ↗
4. Wahab MMA · Int Scholar Res Not · 2012 · 2012 · 1
5. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.027 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00105-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.007 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0036783810.1007/BF00367838 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.009 ↗
11. 10.2514/3.2520410.2514/3.25204 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00048-210.1016/S0143-7496(99)00048-2 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x10.1007/s10704-006-0071-x ↗
14. 10.1515/hf.2010.04110.1515/hf.2010.041 ↗
15. 10.1080/01694243.2013.84535710.1080/01694243.2013.845357 ↗
16. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-310.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-3 ↗
17. 10.1080/01694243.2017.130749710.1080/01694243.2017.1307497 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.022 ↗