A comparative investigation of interfacial adhesion behaviour of polyamide based self-reinforced polymer composites by single fibre and multiple fibre pull-out tests

M. Sharan Chandran; K. Padmanabhan; D. K. Dipin Raj; Yashasvi Chebiyyam

doi:10.1080/01694243.2019.1672467

journal article·2020-03-03

A comparative investigation of interfacial adhesion behaviour of polyamide based self-reinforced polymer composites by single fibre and multiple fibre pull-out tests

M. Sharan Chandran, K. Padmanabhan, D. K. Dipin Raj, Yashasvi Chebiyyam

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology· Volume 34· Issue 5

Publisher page

Source abstract

Abstract

Interfacial adhesion of composite materials plays an important role in their mechanical properties and performance. In the present investigation, analysis of the interfacial properties of self-reinforced polyamide composites by using microbond multiple fibre pull-out test is emphasised. Microbond specimens prepared through thermal processing are tested for their interfacial properties by multiple fibre bundle pull-out tests and compared with that of traditional single fibre pull-out test specimens. Multiple fibre pull-out addresses the volume fraction as well as eliminates the possibility of fibre breakage before matrix shear. Higher scatter in the data in the samples is addressed in the present studies. FTIR and Fractographic studies are carried out for deep understanding of the post pull-out interfacial adhesion.

Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

Polymers Composites

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India

References (22)

Show source-provided references

1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.001 ↗

2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.05110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.051 ↗

3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.024 ↗

4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10707810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107078 ↗

5. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.02110.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.021 ↗

6. 10.1007/BF0055492810.1007/BF00554928 ↗

7. Chandran MS · Int J ChemTech Res · 2014 · 6 · 3310

8. 10.1002/sia.74003040510.1002/sia.740030405 ↗

9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.006 ↗

10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00036-510.1016/S0266-3538(97)00036-5 ↗

11. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.10.02010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.10.020 ↗

12. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90141-310.1016/0266-3538(93)90141-3 ↗

13. 10.1007/s12034-017-1415-z10.1007/s12034-017-1415-z ↗

14. Padmanabhan K, Yue CY. Interfacial properties of Zylon AS/epoxy composites by the multiple fibre pull out technique—a case study. In: Proc-ACUN-4, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; 2002. July 21–25.

15. Barbero EJ. Introduction to composite materials design. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis; 1999. Chapter 4, p. 91–99.

16. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-510.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗

17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.03610.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.036 ↗

18. 10.1080/17518253.2019.162742810.1080/17518253.2019.1627428 ↗

19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.00310.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.003 ↗

20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.06310.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.063 ↗

21. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.12810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.128 ↗

22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.05610.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.056 ↗