Rheological modeling and finite element simulation of epoxy adhesive creep in FRP-strengthened RC beams
Source abstract
Abstract
We have shown that a significant creep occurs at the concrete–fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) interface based on double shear long-term test. The primary test parameters were the shear stress to ultimate shear strength ratio, the epoxy curing time before loading as well as the epoxy thickness. The test results showed that when the epoxy curing time before loading was earlier than seven days the shear stress level significantly affected the long-term behavior of epoxy at the interfaces, and in particular the combined effect of high shear stress and thick epoxy adhesive can result in interfacial failure if subjected to high-sustained stresses. In this paper, based on the previous experimental observations, an improved rheological model was developed to simulate the long-term behavior of epoxy adhesive at the concrete–FRP interfaces. Furthermore, the newly developed rheological creep model was incorporated in finite element (FE) modeling of a reinforced concrete (RC) beam strengthened with FRP sheets. The use of rheological model in FE setting provides the opportunity to conduct a parametric investigation on the behavior of RC beams strengthened with FRP. It is demonstrated that creep of epoxy at the concrete–FRP interfaces increases the beam deflection. It is also shown that consideration of creep of epoxy is essential if part or the entire load supported by FRP is to be sustained.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Emmons PH · Concrete International · 1998 · 20 · 56
2. Rizkalla S · Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials · 2003 · 5 · 1610.1002/pse.139 ↗
3. Roberts TM · Structural Engineering · 1989 · 67 · 229
4. Ziraba YN · Structural Engineering · 1994 · 91 · 639
5. Malek AM · Structural Engineering · 1998 · 95 · 142
6. Ahmed O · Cement Concrete Composites · 2001 · 23 · 310.1016/S0958-9465(00)00051-2 ↗
7. Choi K · Composites Part B · 2007 · 38 · 77210.1016/j.compositesb.2006.10.003 ↗
8. Shrive NG · 2007 · 8310.2495/978-1-84564-057-6/04 ↗
9. Yang QS · Mechanics Research Communications · 2004 · 31 · 33110.1016/j.mechrescom.2003.11.011 ↗
10. Meshgin P · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2009 · 29 · 5610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.003 ↗
11. ASTM C 39/C 39M–04a. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens; 2005.
12. ACI Committee 440 · 2002
13. Neville AM · 1983
14. Hansen TC · 1968
15. Lenczner D · Structural Engineer · 1986 · 64 · 57
16. ANSYS 7.1 · 2003
17. Chen WF · 1982
18. Kupfer HB · American Concrete Institute Journal · 1969 · 66 · 656
19. Chen JF · Journal of Structural Engineering · 2001 · 127 · 78410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(784) ↗
20. Fletcher R · The Computer Journal · 1964 · 7 · 14910.1093/comjnl/7.2.149 ↗